Help! (album)

4
Your rating: None Average: 4 (1 vote)
Album Information
Album Cover Art
By: 
The Beatles
Released: 
Fri, 1965-08-06
Album Type: 
Original
Songs
On Amazon
Sales Rank: 
19
Most-Covered Songs

Help!

0
Your rating: None

Cover versions and notes on The Beatles' song "Help!".

Provenance
Written By: 
Lennon/McCartney
Year: 
1965
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
John Lennon
Cover Versions
Alan W. Pollack's "Notes On"

Notes On "Help!" (H)

Copyright 1989 Alan W. Pollack
All Rights Reserved

With "Help!", let's take a look at a couple of details in the harmony as well as a glance at the overall form.


Harmonic Details

"Help!" is in the key of A but it's the G Major chord that calls for our analytical attention. The G chord appears repeatedly in this song, alternately serving two unrelated purposes; sort of like a character actor filling two different roles in the same play.

In the verse, the G chord appears as a garden variety flat-VII "aeolian cadence":

	A	->c#	->f#	->D	->G	->A
A:      I        iii      vi     IV    flatVII   I

However, in both the intro and the refrain, the G chord serves a more subtle purpose; in the final analysis (ugh!) I'm not even sure what Roman numeral to give it, or whether to give it one at all.

The chord progression of the intro is a classic harmonic example of starting a piece out in left field; "classic" in the sense that early Romantic song writers like Schubert and Schumann loved this gambit. At what point in "Help!" do you know for sure what key we're in ? Below are some of the ways in which I believe the opening chords can be heard; I think that several of the possibilities below are quickly rejected in retrospect by the ear but I list them all to underscore the ambiguity.

		b		->G		->E		->A

is it 	b:	i		VI 		V-of-flat-VII, huh ???
  *or*
	g:	iii		I		V-of-ii, huh ???
  *or*
	D:	vi		VI		V-of-V		V, maybe ???
  *Actually* it's
	A:	ii		flat-VII	V		I

This is more than just mental gymnastics on paper. Try and put yourself in a frame of mind as though you're hearing this for the first time (try!), and play it out "Name That Tune" style, dealing out one chord at a time. Ask yourself at each step, "what key am I in", "where am I heading ?" I think you'll get the picture.

I think one isn't certain of the key being A until the verse actually begins; the possibility of the A at the end of the intro actually being a V which will go the the D as the I chord is very real to the ear.

Once you get used to this progression I believe you hear the overall motion as being from the ii->V->I; a nice subdominant->dominant->tonic cadence. But what of the G chord ? I put a flat-VII under it but I don't hear it that way at all in this context; flat-VII is a surrogate dominant (V-like) function. What I hear in this context is more of a hard to pigeon-hole "filler" chord between the ii and the V. What makes it work is the contrapuntal movement in the outer voices:

	Top:		F#		->G		->G#

	Bottom:		B	->A	->G	->F#	->E

		A:	ii		 ??		  V

Scale-wise motion, particularly in a bassline or particularly when any line moves chromatically as the top line does here, can make the ear follow and "accept" some of the craziest chord progressions. In music of the late nineteenth century (for examples see Chopin or Wagner) this technique could be extended through very long passages creating a rather floating tonal experience. Our example from "Help!" is a very tiny example of this technique -- it extends over only three chords, the outer two of which are clear tonal anchors like the towers of a suspension bridge. If you'll allow me to quickly change metaphors yet again, I like to think of that G chord here making a harmonic "pleat" between it's two neighboring chords.

It's a very pleasing effect; given that the harmonic rhythm is rather slow throughout, this unusual chord progression which is repeated four times in the course of the song is a conspicuous touch which adds a much needed feeling of forward and outward movement.

Two other unrelated harmonic details I can't resist passing by:

I always hear the final phrase of the refrain as follows; there's a V chord on the word "help" which, though not on the rhythm track, is strongly implied by the voices:

	Won't	you	PLEASE	please	help 	me

	E		A		(E)	A
A:	V		I		(V)	I

This pattern is changed in the final refrain and made into a beautiful example of a deceptive cadence, in pure Bach style; i.e., the word "me" in the final refrain is given an f# (vi) chord. As in all such cadences, thing are quickly put "right" in the following and final phrase.

And that brings me to the second detail -- the final chord of this song is yet another added sixth chord. In contrast to the splat-like attack on this chord at the end of "She Loves You", the boys use it in "Help!" with great subtlety; the plain A chord is given on the down beat, and the sixth is added as a melodic neighboring tone, off the beat, in falsetto voice on the phoneme "Ooh"; but you already knew that :-).


Overall Form

Help! has an unusually flat floor plan:

		----- 3X ------
	Intro - Verse - Refrain - Coda

There are a couple of details which help offset the deadly monotony of this:

- there's the effect created by the chromatic chord progression already described above.

- the lyrics of the three verses create an A-B-A pattern

- the instrumental arrangement provides a dramatic and welcome lightening of the texture at the beginning of the last verse.

But I'd argue that this small amount of relief is frankly not enough to dispell an overall closed, static feeling in the song created by the following factors:

- the harmonic rhythm is fairly slow and unvarying throughout. In the verse, except for the phrase "help in any way" where the chords change twice within a measure, the rest of the chords last two whole measures each. In the refrain, the chords last four measures each!

- the 16 measure verse is built out of a musically identical repetition of the same 8 measures.

- the harmony from an architectural viewpoint, is unrelievedly in one key (A) throughout. In spite of the nice effect with the G chord, the refrain provides no relief in terms of excursion or flirtation with a different key. (By contrast, think about the space opened up by the middle eight of a song like "From Me To You".)

All this is not to say that "Help!" is ineffective or unsuccessful; common sense and experience tells us you don't need to be versed in music theory to recognize a great song when you hear it; right!?

If anything, I find myself pondering that perhaps, this unusual unrelieved closedness is intentional and actually part of what makes the impact of the song so strong. The music underscores the single-mindedness of the message contained within the lyrics; shades of "got no time for trivialities" from a different song of the same composer.

Regards,
Alan (awp@mirror.tmc.com)

---
"They tried to fob you off on this musical charlatan,
 but *I* gave him the test."					070989#6

The Night Before

3
Your rating: None Average: 3 (1 vote)

Cover versions and notes on The Beatles' song "The Night Before".

Provenance
Written By: 
Lennon/McCartney
Year: 
1965
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
Paul McCartney
Cover Versions
Alan W. Pollack's "Notes On"

Notes on "The Night Before" (TNB)



  KEY     D Major

  METER   4/4

  FORM    Intro -> Verse -> Verse -> Bridge -> Verse -> Verse (half solo) ->
                        Bridge -> Verse -> Outro (w/complete ending)
                        

GENERAL POINTS OF INTEREST


Style and Form

- With its strong bluesy foreground that is so nicely balanced out by the predominantly pop style that underlies it, this song provides about as good an example as you'll find of the Beatles predilection on the threshold of mid-career for a synthesis of their erstwhile desire to play genuine 12-bar blues with an even greater passion to transcend that it.

- They use the standard long form here, one of their favorites, with its two bridges that are separated by two verse sections, the second one of which is partly for instrumental solo. "From Me To You" and "A Hard Days Night" come to mind as archetypal examples, but there are many others as well.

- In addition, there is an almost subliminally unifying effect created by the recurring use of chromatic shifts and scale fragments; anticipatory shades of Paul's later "You Won't See Me", which happens to share a certain amount of similarity with this song at the level of its subject matter.


Melody and Harmony

- The song utilizes a relatively large number of chords (eight!), fully half of which are foreign in one way or another to the home key. In addition to the I, IV, V, and vi which are diatonically indigenous, we also find here the flat-III, minor iv, flat-VII, and V-of-V.

- In terms of chord progressions, this just may be the first place that The Beatles would use flat-VII in between I and IV. The song also features the first example we've seen in quite a while of the minor iv used in a Major key. Ironically, although I tend to associate the use of this chord especially with John, the most recent example we had seen was back in Paul's "I'll Follow The Sun".

- Chromatic shifting between two flavors of a note appears here under a number of guises. The first and most prominent example is in the opening phrases of the verse where the melodic prominence given to the bluesy minor 3rd (F natural) in phrase 1,2, and 4 is contrasted with a switch to the major 3rd (F#) near the end of phrase 3. Note, by the way just how juicy a cross-relation that heavy use of F natural makes against the D Major chords in the accompaniment.

- Other deployments of the same basic idea are found in the alternation between B natural and B flat implied by the chord change between b minor and g minor in phrase 3 of the verse, as well as the melodic noodling around D/C# and E/D# at the beginning of the bridge.


Arrangement

- Paul's vocal lead is double tracked throughout and he repeatedly throws in a little Gershwinesque grace note in the final phrase of the verse (on the word "did") that reminds me of something John did in "I'm A Loser".

- The vocal arrangement of the verse is of particular interest. What appears at first as a garden variety call-and-response pattern actually turns out to be a single thread vocal line shared, "hocket"-like, between the double-tracked solist (Paul) and the backers. Last time we had seen anything quite like this was "Please Please Me". "Help!" and "You're Going To Lose That Girl" use a device that is, while similar to the hocket, more in the realm of a gloss or commentary on the main line rather than a sharing of it.

- The prominent appearance of the electric piano here yet again would seem to suggest that its sound was something the group had somewhat faddishly latched onto during the late spring of '65.

SECTION-BY-SECTION WALKTHROUGH


Intro

- This is one of those songs where the instrumental texture is relatively unvaried throughout. I'd dare say that if you could find yourself a bootleg of just the backing track for it, it would sound just like the intro.

- This section is one long eight-measure phrase with a slow harmonic rhythm and a chord progression that neatly opens out to V, thereby providing motivation for the verse which follows:

        |D      |-      |F      |-      |G      |-      |A      |-      |
D:       I               flat-III        IV              V
 

- Two nice rhythmic details to listen out for -- Paul's C# -> D anticipation of the first downbeat; and the manner in which the individually syncopated parts combine during in the last couple measures to make for a compound rhythm that is very close to even eighth notes.


Verse

- The verse is a standard sixteen measures long and is made up of four equal phrases that form a poetic pattern of "aabc":

        ------------------------------ 2X -------------------------------
        |D              |C              |G              |A              |
         I              flat-VII         IV              V

        |b              |g              |b              |g              |
         vi              iv              vi              iv

        |D              |G              |D              |-            |
         I               IV              I              |-            |

             verses which are followed by another verse:|F         G  |
                                                        |flat-III  IV |
 

- The narrative and poetic structure is abetted by the harmonic scheme. The first two phrases open up widely to the V chord. The third phrase, rather than providing any kind of resolution, further heightens the suspense and even adds a touch of anxiety by its staying away from I and introducing the ominous sounding minor iv chord. As is typical, the final phrase puts everything right with its return to I. Note, though, how in those verses that are followed by another verse the harmonic ending is modifed so that a motivation for a return to I at the beginning of the next verse is motivated by a forced move away from I at the last moment.

- A faintly stuffy, pedagogical observation about first minor iv chord in phrase 3: it could alternately be parsed as ii6/b5 because of the e in the melody. To the extent that both ii and iv denote a subdominant function though, the difference between the two labels is somewhat moot.

- Although the lead and backing vocalists share the melodic spotlight in the first two phrases, they interestingly overlap at the "seams" of their respective parts. This creates a special effect at the beginning of the second phrase, where the backers falling away from the lead subtly suggests a kind of sighing accompaniment. The manner in which the backers continue on in the third phrase entirely as part of the background wash, only to dramatically desist entirely for the final phrase, also makes for a dramatic effect.

- George, likely feeling finally unbound after keeping such a low profile in the first half of the song, introduces his solo section with an enthusiastic "Yes!". There's a more half-hearted "yeah" that precedes the second bridge, which for all we know, just might be another one of those infamous "anomalies."

- The half-section's worth of guitar solo is doubled at the octave and definitely sounds more worked out and painfully practiced than it does improvised; the tip-off being in the way that both phrases of it are repeated identically. The interjectory nature of the solo and the dissonant manner in which its melodic content rides roughshod over the chords below it sound peversely out of style with the rest of the song. It's as if they were trying to achieve in music the same kind of obtuse non-sequitor which peppers their onstage verbal antics.


Bridge

- The bridge is eight measures long and built out of two equal phrase:

        |A      |D      |G      |-      ||b     |E      |A      |-      |
         V       V-of-IV IV               vi     V-of-V  V
 

- As is a well-established convention, a subtle change of the percussion pattern is used here to help the bridge sound more set-off from the surrounding verses.

- With the exception of the intro, the harmonic rhythm of this song is relatively fast throughout. The phrase endings of this bridge provide a notably rare and brief breath-catching respite.

- The song makes a slight, short-lived modulation toward the key of G, but it pivots right back around to set up a return to the home key with its big finish on the V chord, set up on a silver platter by V-of-V.

- The melodic climax of the entire song occurs at the very end of this section on the high note 'A'. This is felt as especially dramatic in context of the constricted melodic range of the song overall; you'll note how the verse rather butts its head, so to speak, up against a ceiling of G.


Outro

- The complete ending consists of a simple petit reprise of the final phrase that is easily built out of an extension to the end of the verse:

                                |reprise|- guitar riff  ||
        |D      |G      |D      |F      |D      |-      ||
         I       IV      I      flat-III I
 

- The return of the solo guitar for a final fanfare lick lends a classic touch of unity, and anticipates what is essentially the very same gesture that would appear much later in "Penny Lane"!

SOME FINAL THOUGHTS

- At a high level, this song thematically belongs to one of the archtypal sub-genres of the two-minute pop song: the one in which the protagonist, post-breakup, acknowledges what a good thing he had in retrospect and expresses the fond hope and prayer for a reconciliation.

- At a closer level of detail, this one bears a surprising amount of comparison with one very specific other song of Paul's songs; one written pretty much around the same time. Granted, this one is written in direct address to the girl and openly begs for another chance. The other song, in contrast, speaks of the girl in third person and, in spite of an expressed longing for a reversal of the situation, the hero there seems, with grim resignation, to better accept his fate.

- And yet, the common demoninator between the two is in their focus on the past, and in their desire for an impossible turning back of the clock by a mere 24 hours. In this sense, in spite of all other differences in musical style, the two songs are closely enough related that I could almost imagine their two titles reversed or comingled: "Last Night" and "The Day Before" :-).

Regards,
Alan (awp@bitstream.com OR uunet!huxley!awp)

---
"I will be pleased, men, to see the earth disintegrated." 112392#70
---

Copyright (c) 1992 by Alan W. Pollack
All Rights Reserved This article may be reproduced, retransmitted, redistributed and otherwise propagated at will, provided that this notice remains intact and in place.

You've Got to Hide Your Love Away

4
Your rating: None Average: 4 (1 vote)

Cover versions and notes on The Beatles' song "You've Got to Hide Your Love Away".

Provenance
Written By: 
Lennon/McCartney
Year: 
1965
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
John Lennon
Cover Versions
Videos
Alan W. Pollack's "Notes On"

Notes on "You've Got to Hide Your Love Away" (YGTHYLA)

With this one, we have a song that both further exemplifies some of John's signature style traits, as well as one which, in its time, broke some new ground. The music itself is relatively so straightforward in this song that I'm going to skip the bar-by-bar analysis for the most part, the better to home-in on the more interesting topics.


Harmonic Frugality

It's tempting to attribute what I describe as John's penchant for harmonic frugality as more a reflection of a limited vocabulary than a conscious element of style. But while the latter may be a slight exaggeration, the former would be grossly unfair; granted, much of his output (both early and late) is heavily blues based or influenced, but at the very least, during the Sgt. Pepper and White Album period, we have several examples, such as "Strawberry Fields Forever" and "I Am the Walrus" which are quite imaginative in chord progression.

But at any rate, with our current selection, we have yet another song built exclusively out of four chords; in order of appearance, you have G, D, C, and F. The key is G major, so gramatically, in addition to the standard I, V, and IV, we also have the modal sounding "flat VII" chord.

The use of such a limited harmonic palette contributes to the extremely closed tonal shape of the song. There are no excursions or modulations away from the home key. Luckily, as a matter of avoiding a stultifying sense of stasis, each of the two phrases of the verse section respectively opens up to either the IV or V chord which at least help "motivate" the refrain, and similarly, the two phrases in the refrain section each end on V which neatly leads back around into the next verse.


Almost Pure Modal Harmony

I haven't done an exhaustive study of it (and should! hey, where's my facts checker today when I need her ?), but I believe that this "flat VII" chord, which became so much a part of not just the Beatles' vocabulary, but much of rock music in general during the late 60s, becomes noticeably more common starting with the "Help!" album.

Prior to this album, the only Len/Mac song with a flat VII in it that comes to mind is the title track on "A Hard Day's Night". On the "Help!" album, you find that in addition to the title track, the next *four* Len/Mac songs on side one all contain this special chord; i.e. "The Night Before", our current song, "Another Girl", and "You're Going to Lose that Etc". (And I repeat, I haven't done my homework exhaustively yet so there might be even more!) Does this perhaps give you the feeling that the composer(s) were having a field day playing with a new harmonic "toy" so to speak ?

I describe the harmonic style of YGTHYLA as "almost" modal because of the use here of the Major V chord together with the flat VII. By way of contrast, we saw how in "She Said She Said", the modal spell is kept unbroken by using the *minor* v chord. One spicy by-product of this almost purely modal style is the repeated ocurrence of the indirect juxtaposition of the F sharps in the D chord with the F naturals in the F chord. "Technically" (i.e. pedantically), they're not quite cross relations because in this song, those two chords never follow each other immediately.


Three-Quarter Time

Perhaps the following will come as no surprise to those resident teenagers out there who make a religion out of knowing such details, but a semi- exhaustive search through the tracks on the official albums of the Beatles reveals John to be the most partial of the four toward songs written in ternary meters. Of course, songs in such time signatures comprise only a small fraction of the total canon, but I thought it was interesting to note to whom the lion's share of these belonged:

John -- Baby's in Black
	*YGTHYLA  (our song du jour!)
	Norwegian Wood
	Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds (verse)
	Yer Blues
	I WANT YOU (She's so heavy) (in part)
	Dig a Pony

Paul -- She's Leaving Home
	Oh! Darling

George  -- Long, Long, Long
	I Me Mine

(BTW, given George's small "market share" of the official canon, it's significant that in this category, he comes in tied with Paul.)


The Arrangement

The arrangement of this song is notable on two grounds: the *almost* exclusive use of acoustic instruments (sorry, Mark L., but this boy-o hears an electric Hoffner), and the first(!) use of a hired studio musician to supply a part played on "exotic" instruments; i.e. alto and tenor flutes. At risk of belaboring the obvious, this latter tactic became a major clue to the new direction of the boys for many albums to come.


The Form

For a change, there are no fancy tricks in this song with unusual phrase lengths; everything is built out of even numbers of measures and phrases. Do note though, the rather folksy form, the most unique feature of which is the way the "verse" containing the instrumental solo is pushed all the way to the end!:

	Verse - Verse - Refrain - Verse - Verse - Refrain - Verse/Solo

I find it intruiging that many people hear the influence of Dylan in this song. Beyond John's vocal style and the lyrics, I wonder if part of this reaction is based on the use of this form; think of how many of Zimmy's own ballads save the harmonica solo for *after* the final verse!


Vulnerability

Though you know I generally don't get too involved with the lyrics, being pretty much a straight-arrow chords and form sort of fellow, I can't quite ignore what seem to me to be the strange apsects of the words in this song.

We tend to take it for granted that we know all about how the young rebel who was suspended by Headmaster Pobjoy for throwing a blackboard out the classroom window actually had such an insecure, and vulnerable soft core. For every song like "You Can't Do That", there is also one like "Misery". Whenever you find him talking about striking back, if you just wait a minute, you'll also hear about the heartache which motivates it.

But I do believe that YGTHYLA is unique even in this context: here we find our hero immobilized to the point where vengence is the least thing on his mind because it hurts so badly that he can't even stand to be around other people; an even greater emotional crash than in "I'll Cry Instead". In spite of this, we are privy to his state -- as though we could read his mind or his private journal -- and it is from this unusual sense of intimacy that I believe the song derives much of its impact. (BTW, it's interesting to note how such a similar song in tone as "Yes it Is" was recorded in the same week!)

But there is a delightful, almost Dylanesque ellipticality to these lyrics as well. From the phrase "*If* she's gone", you can't tell for certain where we come in within the timeline of the story being told; e.g., has she already gone for good, or are they merely separating for something like a six month hiatus, or perhaps is he just rehearsing his fear of her possibly leaving ?

Similarly, the line "how could she say to me love will find a way" is very difficult; it's the sort of comment you expect someone to make when they're trying to keep a relationship going no matter what, against all odds and obstacles, not when one is ramping down or breaking off. But then again, maybe our hero is himself perplexed and hurt by this very difficulty. For when love somehow cannot find a way, when such a thing is just not possible, is there ever any middle ground left to which one can go ?

Regards,
Alan (awp@bitstream.com *OR* uunet!huxley!awp)

---
"You'd have wound up a Senior Citizen of Boston. As it is, you took the wrong turn and what happened, you're a lonely old man from Liverpool." 051590#18
---

Copyright (c) 1990 by Alan W. Pollack All Rights Reserved This article may be reproduced, retransmitted, redistributed and otherwise propagated at will, provided that this notice remains intact and in place.

I Need You

3
Your rating: None Average: 3 (1 vote)

Cover versions and notes on The Beatles' song "I Need You".

Provenance
Written By: 
George Harrison
Year: 
1965
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
George Harrison
Cover Versions
Alan W. Pollack's "Notes On"

Notes on "I Need You" (INY)


  
  KEY     A Major

  METER   4/4

  FORM    Intro -> Verse -> Verse -> Bridge -> Verse ->
                     Bridge -> Verse -> Outro (w/complete ending)

GENERAL POINTS OF INTEREST


Style and Form

- We have another intruiguing stylistic mix here, this time from George. The pop-rock core is augmented by a folksy undercurrent that manifests itself most strongly in the haunting pseudo-modality of the tune.

- The choice of form is the shorter two-bridge model where the bridges are separated by only one section.

- George's proclivity for blurring somewhat the division between verse and bridge sections by the phrasing of the lyrics shows up again here though in not as pronounced a form as the one observed in "You Like Me Too Much".


Melody and Harmony

- A relatively large number of chords is used (seven!), though there is nothing more exotic in this entire bundle than a V-of-V. George's taste for weakly transitive chord progressions is reflected here in both the holding back of the V chord for as late as the bridge, and his reliance in the verse on IV -> I and the even more indirect stepwise choice of ii -> I to establish the sense of home key.

- George uses an effective trick of his mates in keeping the melodic pitch content and style of the verse and bridge sections distinctively different. Whether or not you're willing to accept this notion as operable on even a subconscious level, you can't deny how striking is the de facto evidence of this effect.

- The verse derives a folksy modalism from the manner in which its melody is restricted to a pentatonic scale (A-B-C#-E-F#) with the solitary exception of one note that is a flat-seventh (G natural), not strictly speaking part of the scale for the home key; look out for it at the very end of the second phrase. This tune is also made distinctive by its large number of appoggiaturas, several of which leave dissonant, non-harmonic tones hanging at vocal phrase endings; see below.

- Just as the V chord is held back until the bridge, so does the non-pentatonic fourth scale degree suddenly make a featured appearance in the tune of that section. In the second half of this bridge we also find a very non-folksy chromatic shifting amongst D natural -> D# -> D natural that is reminiscent to the trick we saw Paul play just last time out in "The Night Before".


Arrangement

- The backing track has a nicely balanced, airy texture of acoustic rhythm guitar mixed with a part for electric pedal tone guitar in which the latter instrument sounds almost like a keyboard.

- The vocal track is pure Middle Period Beatles almost as though it were a recipe-pattern done up "by the numbers": the composer double-tracked on the lead and the two others (with very rare exception, such as "Carry That Weight" where you can hear him right through the heavy mix, Ringo didn't "do" backing vocals) providing an instrumental- like backwash of "ahhhs" in second half of verse and bridge.

- Those mockingbird pedal tone fills at the phrase endings become a leitmotif for the song. As we'll see below, in a couple of instances where the vocal phrases end up on an unresolved dissonance, these guitar fills actually are neccessary to tie up what would otherwise be a disconcerting loose end.

SECTION-BY-SECTION WALKTHROUGH


Intro

- The intro is a mere two measures worth of vamping on the I chord, but in it are quickly introduced both the basic instrumental texture of the entire song as well as the melodic two-part turn 'round C# (C# -> B, D -> C#) which recurs as a motif in all the verse sections which follow.


Verse

- The verse is an unusual fourteen measures in length made up of four phrases which create a classic aa'bc pattern. The last phrase is half the length of the other three and this asymmetry lends a subtle feeling of poetic, free-verse to the whole:

         ----------------------------- 2X ------------------------------
        |A              |D              |A              |-              |
A:       I               IV              I

        |f#             |c#             |f#             |b              |
         vi              iii             vi              ii

        |A              |-              |
         I
 

- The pedal tone guitar turn around C# heard in the intro (or a slight variation on it) reappears at the end of the three of the four phrases of this verse, overlapping in each case with the last two notes of the vocal line in each case.

- In the first two of these phrases the vocal line binds off unusually with an appoggiatura that creates an unresolved dissonance against the chord below it. If you've ever been nearly so depressed, yourself, to the point that you no longer have the energy or motivation to quite finish your sentences before they trail off a few words or so before their proper ending, then you'll likely relate to the poetic effect created by these dissonant, tentative phrase endings.

- In the first and second phrases, you have C#->B and A->G respectively sung against an A Major chord. Without the D->C# resolution offered by the second half of the guitar turn which follows, you'd be left hanging in each of these cases as though waiting for a shoe to drop. Try imagining this scenario out in your mind.


Bridge

- The bridge is nine measures long and its two unequal phrases present an elongated free verse effect that is the exact opposite to the similar truncated effect seen in the verse:

        |D              |E              |A              |-              |
         IV              V               I

        |D              |E              |B              |E      |-      |
         IV              V               V-of-V          V
 

- To the extent that this bridge section provides any contrast to the surrounding verses it is because the home key is established here with more forceful clarity than anywhere else in the song; note the use in this section of both V and V-of-V. We're actually much more used to the opposite effect: of the home key having been established to an almost monotnous fault over the course of the first couple of verses, and the bridge providing contrast by making a brief excursion away from it.

- And ever true to the by-the-numbers recipe for contrasting bridge sections you'll note the addition of a cowbell to the percussion track for just this section.


Outro

- The eight-measure coda is developed as an extension to the final verse, and it kicks in right where the truncated fourth phrase of the verse section is usually to be found:

        |A      |-      |f#     |-      |D      |-      |A      |-      |
         I               vi              IV              I
 

- Harmonically, the coda is built out of the I-vi-IV cliche minus the expected V chord, but the omission of the latter chord is very much in keeping in this instance with the rest of the song.

- The vocal line at this late stage of the song turns around and plays the same mockingbird game as did the pedal tone guitar earlier on. Here, the vocal line repeats three times the same exact melodic phrase of three notes (A -> B -> C#) over each chord change. The effect is especially striking where the ending on C# creates a Major 7th dissonance against the D Major chord; the resolution to which, as always, is provided ultimately by the now familiar D -> C# of the guitar part.

SOME FINAL THOUGHTS

- We find George at his absolutely most vulnerable in this song. Granted, he had appeared pretty crashed out way back in "Don't Bother Me", but with the net result of his being unable to speak directly to his erstwhile love, or anyone else for that matter. In "You Like Me Too Much", on the other hand, he not only seemed sufficiently recovered to address The Girl directly, but he even swaggered a bit before her with his gentle chiding. And in the likes of "Think For Yourself" would come just around the next corner, he would raise the emotional ante from mere negativity all the way to disdain and ridicule.

- Viewed from this perspective, "I Need You" scores uniquely for its bittersweetly mixed tone of plaintive, terminal desperation.

Regards,
Alan (awp@bitstream.com OR uunet!huxley!awp)

---
"You want to stop being so scornful, it's twisting your face." 120792#71
---

Copyright (c) 1992 by Alan W. Pollack
All Rights Reserved This article may be reproduced, retransmitted, redistributed and otherwise propagated at will, provided that this notice remains intact and in place.

Another Girl

0
Your rating: None

Cover versions and notes on The Beatles' song "Another Girl".

Provenance
Written By: 
Lennon/McCartney
Year: 
1965
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
Paul McCartney
Cover Versions
Alan W. Pollack's "Notes On"

Notes on "Another Girl" (AG)

KEY A Major

METER 4/4

FORM       Intro -> Verse -> Verse -> Bridge -> Verse ->
                        Bridge -> Verse -> Outro

GENERAL POINTS OF INTEREST


Style and Form

- If you make the effort to get beyond the pedestrian lyrics and the by-today's-standards embarrassing visual background given this song in the _Help!_ film (Paul out on a beach holding a woman sideways and 'playing' her like some kind of anthropomorphic bass guitar -- or do I misremember it ?), you find here a song that is a veritable cross-section of the tricks and trademarks of the Beatles to this point of their career.

- We also find in this song yet another example of John's cross-influence on Paul. Though the influence in this case is not as obvious on the surface of things as it is in the case of, say, "Paperback Writer" and "Rain", the parallels between "Another Girl" and "You're Going To Lose That Girl" (YGTLTG) are as striking as they are surprising, once they've been pointed out to you. - The form sounds subtly more unusual than it actually is because of the extremely refrain-like final phrase of the verse section. The last time we had seen this effect, way back in this series YGTLTG and "It Won't Be Long" (IWBL), it had thrown us off guard quite a bit. Once you parse this phrase as part of the verse proper, the form suddenly reveals itself as one of the standard forms, with two-verses, two-bridges, and only one verse intervening. The use of such a pseudo-refrain, though, especially when it also appears as the song's introductory section, does have a unique the power to, if not outright confuse, make a formalistically fluid impression.


Melody and Harmony

- The melody makes prominent thematic use of downward chromatic scale fragments and a certain amount of noodling around the same few notes in a constricted pitch range; *both* Beatles trademarks.

- Although the song is hardly a 12-bar blues ditty in terms of chords, tune, or phrasing, the melodical stress on the flat 3rd (C natural) and flat 7th (G natural) scale degrees projects bluesy feel overall.

- The verses rely entirely on I, IV, V, and the flat-VII deployed simply as a neighboring chord between two instances of I. The bridge, though, features an unusual (in context of the Beatles) full-blown modulation to the key of C Major whose relationship to the home key is that of "relative Major of the parallel minor"; the latter being one of this songs principal and unmistakable connections with YGTLTG.

- The emphasis on the melodic flat 3rd is sufficiently stronger than average here to create a Major/minor ambiguity regarding the mode of the home key that is somewhat reminiscent of "I'll Be Back". The effect is especially noticeable where the music returns to A Major at the end of the bridge, and makes you wonder in retrospect if, in the verses, it really was only the melody and not the chords too performed in the minor mode; what do the chord books say there ? Is the first chord A Major or minor?


Arrangement

- Paul is double tracked on the lead vocal with the familiar italicizing effect of the backing voices joining him on the recurring title phrase.

- George supplies notable guitar fills, the frequency and raucousness of which both increase over the course of the song.

SECTION-BY-SECTION WALKTHROUGH


Intro

- The song opens vocally with absolutely no instrumental cue, yet another affinity with John's YGTLTG and IWBL.

- The intro turns out to anticipate the final phrase of the verse section. It's a phrase whose length comes out to be closer to five than four measures; at the very least, it ends on the downbeat of the fifth measure. A side effect of this peculiarity is that the phrase tends to suggest an ellision or overlap with the beginning of whatever follows it whenever it appears:

                                        |Verse -->
        |A      |D      |A      |D      |A ...
A:       I       IV      I       IV      I

Verse

- The sixteen measure verse has a phrasing pattern of AABC and sounds almost like a non-traditional 12-bar form plus short refrain:

        ------------------------------- 2X ------------------------------
        |A              |G              |A              |D              |
         I               flat-VII        I               IV

        |D              |-              |-              |E              |
         IV                                              V

        |A              |D              |A              |D              |
         I               IV              I               IV

- The IV chord which gets sustained through four measures that *don't* exactly coincide with where the phrase divisions lie provides a good example of how harmonic rhythm can be used to strong, albeit subliminal effect.


Bridge

- This eight-measure section sounds as though entered as an ellided, directed extension of the 'refrain':

        |C      |G      |C      |G      |C      |E      |A      |E      |
         I       V       I       V       I
                                       a:III     V       I       V
                                                        (surprise!)

- The music briefly modulates to the key of C Major before it pivots back to A. The pivot in this case relies on tricking you into expecting a return to a minor with the A Major chord then coming as a surprise twist.

- The pivot *into* the modulation is interesting; forcing you, as a listener to hear the final D chord in the preceding verse punning itself as both IV in the home key as well as V-of-V in the new key, the latter not being resolved until two measures into the bridge.

- As is so often the case, the bridge provides melodic contrast with the verses in the way that the erstwhile noodling within a small range is reaplaced here by an extended arch shape which supplies at its zenith the unique melodic high point of the piece.


Outro

- The outro is a simple extension of the verse ending with the the title phrase repeated a canonical three times.

- The trailing guitar lick at the very end is a novel touch that helps unify the song overall from the way in which it carries forward both the motif of the ubiquitous guitar fills and the blusey undercurrent.

SOME FINAL THOUGHTS

- This song may be far from what you'd call one of Paul's career highlights but you've got to admire his craftmanship here even if the material itself is less than entirely distinguished.

- You may want to quibble with Paul from time to time over whether or not you think he exerts a sufficiently discriminating filter on the supply of new ideas and directions which pop into his head. But in terms his facility in the developing of such ideas and his seemingly casual and second-nature mastery of technique, you can only be amazed; maybe :-)


Regards,
Alan (awp@bitstream.com *OR* uunet!huxley!awp)


---
"Give 'em a pull."                                              122292#72
---

                Copyright (c) 1992 by Alan W. Pollack
                          All Rights Reserved

       This article may be reproduced, retransmitted, redistributed and
       otherwise propagated at will,  provided that this notice remains
       intact and in place.

You're Going to Lose That Girl

3
Your rating: None Average: 3 (1 vote)

Cover versions and notes on The Beatles' song "You're Going to Lose That Girl".

Provenance
Written By: 
Lennon/McCartney
Year: 
1965
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
John Lennon
Cover Versions
Alan W. Pollack's "Notes On"

Notes on "You're Going To Lose That Girl" (YGTLTG.1)

KEY     E Major

METER   4/4

FORM    Intro -> Verse -> Verse' -> Bridge ->
                Verse' -> Bridge -> Verse' -> Outro (w/complete ending)

GENERAL POINTS OF INTEREST


Style and Form

- "You're Going To Lose That Girl" (YGTLTG) and "Help!" make for an an interesting pair of compositional siblings to the extent to that both songs similarly exploit (not just "utilize") the flat-VII chord, and share a similar approach to their backing vocals.

- But YGTLTG also does some funky formalistic things of its own which belie our seemingly straightforward categorization of it as being in the standard "double bridge" model with single verse (that happens to incorporate a guitar solo) intervening. To wit:

    - The same title-based hook phrase is used to both open the song as well as end each verse with a kind of mini-refrain.

    - The bridge is foreshortened by a single measure shy of what would have been a more expectable length of eight measures.

    - The transition into the bridge involves both an extension of the verse's length and an harmonic sleight of hand. The transition back from the bridge involves both a different harmonic sleight of hand and that forehshortening of the bridge's length.

- More on all of these techniques below. Keep in mind, for now, that details such are these are among the tangible, susbstantive musical elements that "define" the Beatles style and sound. It matters not that such tricks are neither unique to this song nor were neccessarily invented by the Beatles themselves. Rather it is the freedom and liberality with which such tricks are deployed throughout the Beatles songbook that stands out dramaticfally against the backdrop of standard/average (read: ordinary/mediocre) pop music of the period from which the Beatles emerged.

- The lyrics all three verses are based on the computer programmer's conditional "if/then" clause, with the third verse being a literal repeat of the first. The two bridges feature identical lyrics that are contrastingly couched in a consequentially assertive tone of voice.


Melody and Harmony

- The introductory hook phrase is notable for its pentatonic flavor and broad arch shape marked by long jumps. The rest of the melodic material is less sharply characterized and placed in a generally lower range.

- The tune of the intro begins with a "pickup" that precedes the first downbeat of the song. The verse and bridge, by contrast, begin "after" the downbeat of their respective sections. Compare this with the other songs we've looked at thus far in this series, and be prepared to track this parameter as we move forward in the series:

    WCWIO has a verse that starts after the downbeat, but both its hook phrase and bridge start "on" the downbeat.

    AILH is a song in which the verse and bridge are "after;" the hook phrase actually "precedes" (aka "is a pickup to") the downbeat.

    DT has a verse and bridge that is on the downbeat and a hook phrase that precedes.

    SLY conspicuously precedes the downbeat in every section, in many cases just with a single syllable.

    H! is a bit harder to parse because of the countrapuntal vocal arrangement. Strictly following the lead line gives us an Intro and Verse that follow the downbeat and a refrain that is emphatically right on it.

- A relatively large number of chords are used, along with a change of key for the bridge section that's a real test of our skills for dealing with so-called pivot modulations. The harmonic rhythm is fast throughout, with a chord change on almost every measure except, interestingly, in the bridge.

- For the verse the standard, indigenous choices of I, ii, V, and vi are supplemented by V-of-vi (in place of iii) and flat-VII. The bridge supplements its use of I and IV with its own flat-VII.

- The home key of the song is E Major but its bridge is clearly in the remote key of G Major. There's no flirtation or fake pass here; it's a fullblown interlude in that second key. I call it "remote" because there is no G chord (either Major or minor) that's native to the key of E; remember, there are four sharps in the key signature, the third of which is G#. In fact, there are NO indigenous chords common between the two keys.

- The only "rationalizable" relationship between E Major and G Major is to say that G is the relative Major of our parallel minor key. Think it over; it may sound convoluted but it's not double talk!

- Given the lack of naturally occuring common chords, the pivot modulation is cleverly made by exploiting the flat-VII chord, treating it, double entendre style as the V of the key of flat III; this is gramatically legitimate though still a surprise. When we looked at Help! last time, we saw there a different, but equally creative and unusual application of the flat VII chord. It's tempting to suggest that the fact that H! and YGTLTG were composed in close proximity to each other implies more than mere coincidence.

- The modulation to flat III which we have here is the more audacious because there is an easier/textbook alternate way to make this key change -- i.e., switch from Major to parallel minor (e.g., "I'll Be Back"), and then it's a short hop to the relative Major (e.g., AILH). Off the top of my head I can't think of a song that combines both these techniques but it's not unheard of; trust me!

- Going to a remote key is one thing, but getting back to the original one can be even more challenging; like rescuing a cat from a treetop. In this case, the Beatles use a pivot chord we haven't seen yet; treating the F Major chord as both the flat-VII of G and the flat-II of the original home key.

- Flat-II is sometimes called the "Neapolitan chord". It's actually not all that exotic a chord, at least not in the classical world; a lot of Baroque music employs this chord in final cadences such as flat II->V-I with the flat II in its first inversion. Usage of the flat II chord in YGTLTG is unusual in that appears in root position and without a V chord between it and the I. This is not the first time the Beatles used this device; it is used with similarly audacious effect in " Things We Said Today" to slide back to the home key from the bridge.


Arrangement

- The backing track is relatively homogeneous with the standard combo backed up by a bottom-heavy piano part, and of course, those bongos. They're unessential but delightful; a sort of squiggly pencil border drawn around a colorful drawing. For a really good time (just when you think you've had your fill of this song) give it a listen, preferably with earphones, and try and hear the bongo part in the foreground with the rest of the music as "accompaniment." Who said Ringo couldn't do anything intricate?

- John sings lead, heavily echoed and double-tracked throughout, with repeated recourse to falsetto for the notes from high G# and upward that occur at the end of each verses.

- The Greek Chorus backing vocals of Paul and John bear some contrast with the ones in "Help!" despite their similarities. Since the backers in this song consistently *trail* the lead, their overall melodic impact is more in the way of antiphonal obligatto, in spite of their frequent overlap with the lead part.

- In this connection I'm reminded of a Playboy cartoon of the same period in which a FAB look alike is harranguing his girl friend, in bed with someone else, while his mates standing right behind him, periphrastically reinforce his message. Don't ask me how I snuck that issue of the magazine into the house :-)

SECTION-BY-SECTION WALKTHROUGH


Intro

- The intro is four measures long and has an open harmonic shape, moving from I to V, and nicely motivating the verse which follows. Label this Phrase "A" for now and make note of it:

        |E              |c#             |f#9            |B              |
E:       I               vi              ii              V

- We have another "in medias res" opening: no intro, not even a single chord from which the singers can find their opening notes -- a miracle of the recording studio :-).


Verse

- The verse is 12 measures in length, built out of three even phrases in a 3 * 4, "BBA" pattern. The final phrase is the one we've already heard for the intro. The overall section's like a 12-bar blues frame with very different harmony; here all three phrases open out from I to V:

        Phrase "B"
        ------------------------------ 2X -------------------------------
        |E              |G#             |f#             |B              |
         I               V-of-vi         ii              V


        |E              |c#             |f#9            |B              |
         I               vi              ii              V

- Label the repeating first phrase of the verse as "Phrase B" and observe how the phrasing pattern running from the start of the song through the second verse is a symmetrical pallindrome of A-BB-A-BB-A. For all its symmetry, though, this passage keeps us a great deal more off balance than the more typical four-=sqaure design for a couple of reasons beyond the obvious uneven nature of a grouping of seven:

  • There is an almost hypnotic effect created by the fact that both phrases A and B end with a ii->V chord progression. If it wasn't for the delightful "9" chord in phrase A (with the falsetto G# in the voices) we'd have a potential problem with monotony.
  • From a casual listen, we're not sure how the seven phrases are meant to be parsed; is it two verses of ABB-ABB with a concluding repeat of A or is it two verses of BB surrounded on each side with a refrain of A ? But my question is a bit of a strawman.

- In the final result, I think it's the delayed entrance of the drums until the first B phrase that help's clarify the situation, with its hint that the opening A phrase was "probably" an introduction, from which point the rest of the analysis falls in place with relative ease. The reappearance of the BBA pattern after each bridge really nails it.


Verse'

- All verses that are not immediately followed by another verse (which means all the verses in the song except the first one) are extended to an unusual 14 measure length by the following half phrase which effects the modulation to G in the bridge by pivoting on the D Major chord:

        |f#             |D              |
E:       ii              flat-VII
                     G:  V

- The middle verse features a lead guitar solo for the two "BB" phrases, with the backing vocals still hanging on, and the complete vocal chorus (including lead) resuming in the final "A" phrase.


Bridge

- The bridge cruises along nicely in G and then, just as deftly as it shifted there from E, it shifts back as follows to E for the next verse:

        |G              |C              |G              |-              |
G:       I               IV              I

        |G              |C              |F               E
         I               IV              flat VII
                       E:V-of-flat II    flat II          I

- The section is an uneven 7 measures long, and built out of two parallel but unequal phrases in a 4 + 3, AA' pattern. The foreshortening of the second phrase subtly draws your attention all the more closely to the harmonic gambit played at its end. As an experiment, repeat the F chord for an additional measure before dropping to E and you'll see that it's more satisfactorially four-square in one respect but less, for lack of a better word, "fun."


Outro

- The outro develops out of the final verse at just the point where it sounds like an impossible third bridge might be forthcoming. Instead, that flat-VII, D Major chord is used as the start of a surprise concluding "double Plagal" cadence, the only place in the entire song where the harmonic rhythm exceeds one chord per measure:

        |f#             |D          A       |E          |-              |
         ii              flat-VII   IV       I
                         (IV-of-IV?)

- It's ironic that a song with so much harmonic movement from I to V should choose to end with this heavily Plagal formula.

SOME FINAL THOUGHTS

- In the "Help!" film the Beatles appear as though performing this song live in the studio. The scene, for all its absurd, staged surreality -- (Paul alternately playing bass guitar and sitting a grand piano, and Ringo alternately behind the drum kit or sitting on the floor with the bongos) -- it provides a delightful fantasy of what the real recording sessions might have been like.

- The tobacco companies must have also like this scene. Ringo is shown drumming with a cigarette precariously clenched in his teeth. And we get a long close-up of Paul and George facing each other, hunched on opposite sides of a single microphone in order to tightly execute the backing vocals. The scene is filmed with back lighting such that you can see the rhythmic thrust of their sung syllables punctuate like skywriting the generally smokey haze that builds up as the scene progresses.

- It's the kind of thing that looks cool enough to persuade a person of a certain mindset to want to start smoking as soon as possible, even if the thought has never before occured to that person. So much for not particularly subliminal persuasion.

Regards,

Alan (awp@world.std.com)

---

"Well look after him.  I don't want to find you've
 lost him."                                                  051900#7.1

---

Revision History
071989  7.0     Original release
051900  7.1     Revise, expand and adapt to series template

                Copyright (c) 2000 by Alan W. Pollack
                          All Rights Reserved
This article may be reproduced, retransmitted, redistributed and otherwise propagated at will, provided that this notice remains intact and in place.

Ticket to Ride

5
Your rating: None Average: 5 (1 vote)

Cover versions and notes on The Beatles' song "Ticket to Ride".

Provenance
Written By: 
Lennon/McCartney
Year: 
1965
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
John Lennon
Cover Versions
Alan W. Pollack's "Notes On"

Notes on "Ticket To Ride" (TTR)


KEY A Major

METER 4/4

FORM Intro -> Verse -> Verse -> Bridge -> Verse -> Bridge -> Verse -> Outro (fadeout)

GENERAL POINTS OF INTEREST


Style and Form

- After the folksy originals and nostalgic covers of the Beatles For Sale album, "Ticket To Ride" brings with it a measure of tight toughness that is most welcome to those wondering wither this erstwhile sharp edge of the group's attitude and style had fled following the Hard Day's Night album.

- The form is an ordinary two-bridge model with only one verse in the middle and no instrumental section. The special kicks here are to be found in the arrangement, especially in its exploitation of texture, rhythm, and harmonic dissonance.


Melody and Harmony

- Although the tune does not make a primarily bluesy impression, both the flat 7th and minor 3rd scale degrees do bear some melodic emphasis in the verse and bridge, respectively.

- Five of the seven chords that naturally occur in the home key as well as the flat-VII chord are used. No other more exotic chords show up nor is there any hint of modulation. This relatively bland harmonic diet is spiced up by the liberal use of free melodic dissonance and a certain suspense factor created by the exceedingly slow harmonic rhythm.

- In the dissonance department, Major ninths and seconds appear as though a leitmotif. Not only is there an unusual number of 9th chords in the song, but the bare interval is also found within the opening ostinato figure as well as in the repetitious vocal line which takes the song out at the end.


Arrangement

- The ostinato figure played by the solo 12-string guitar at the outset provides a great deal of unity to the song. As we've seen in other ostinato-driven songs of the Beatles, these recurring, motorized little figures seem to create the illusion of being there in the backing track more of the time than is actually so. For example, if the figure is apparent at both the beginning and end of a section, as long as there is something of sufficient interest to divert your attention in the middle, you will subconsciously "assume" that the figure has continued all the while, even though if you double check carefully you'll find that this is not so!

- The ostinato used here's not as distinctively melodic as the ostinati in either "What You're Doing" or "Day Tripper", but it does have a wrenchingly syncopated rhythm which carries all the through to the characteristic backbeat of the intro and first two verses:

                                    >     >   >
        rhythmic emphasis       1 & 2 & 3 & 4 &

        ostinato                A   E C#A B   E
                                    >     >   >
 

- As a foil to all this, the tambourine is relegated to simply marking off the 2nd and 4th beats of virtually every measure in every verse.

- The vocal arrangement is fussier than we've seen in a while, with three alternating textures used in the verse, alone. The first half of the first phrase is sung by John, solo and single-tracked. Paul joins him above on funky counterpoint for the remainder of this phrase into the first half of the next one, and then leaves John exposed solo at the phrase's end. John then sings the third phrase double tracked with Paul joining him for a final touch of counterpoint at the end of the fourth phrase.

SECTION-BY-SECTION WALKTHROUGH


Intro

- The intro consists of a four-fold presentation of the ostinato figure over the I chord. The ensemble joins the solo guitar with a slow dramatic drumroll just before the downbeat of measure 3:

        |A      |-      |-      |-      |

- The parallel between this and "You Can't Do That" or "Day Tripper" is noteworthy. The accentuation here by the drumming of the syncopated rhythm inherent in the guitar ostinato is especially gripping and literally pulls you into the music.

- Say, is that a small touch of organ or harmonium used as a wash behind the solo guitar opening ? If so, does it continue throughout, just buried in the mix ? or perhaps, does it drop out quickly once the rest of the ensemble gets going ?


Verse

- The verse sixteen measures long, built out of four phrases equal in length. The section more logically splits right down the middle, with the first half providing an eight-measure expository section that harmonically opens up to the V chord, and the second eight measures providing a refrain-like ending which veers back toward the I:

        |A      |-      |-      |-      ||A     |-      |b      |E      |
A:       I                                               ii      V

        |f#     |D      |f#     |G      ||f#    |E      |A      |-      |
         vi      IV      vi      flat-VII vi     V       I
 

- The tune has an unusually high amount of rhythmic syncopation against the underlying beat (on "four-AND") as well as melodic dissonance against the underlying chords. I'll leave the majority of such details as an exercise for the reader though two examples here are noteworthy. First off, the melodic sustaining of the pitch E over the b chord in measure 7, on the second syllable of the word "away". Even better is the the climactic event over the G Major chord in measure 12, with John singing the pitches F#-E-C# on the stretched out word "ri-i-de", none of which is consonant with the chord below it.

- The three-way alternating pivot off the vi (f#) chord is one of the more novel harmonic gambits we've ever seen the Beatles pull; first to the IV, then to the flat-VII, and ultimately to the V, which under the circumstances is the most comfortingly "functional" of the three choices. It kind of reminds of the feeling one has in a chess game where you think you've been check-mated, but in a half-panic, on considering your several brute-force logical alternatives, you eventually discover with some relief that there is still at least one legal move available to you with which to continue the game.

- The vocal counterpoint at the beginning of the second phrase not only features their trademark parallel, open fourths, but Paul's initial stress on the pitch B provides a development of the added- ninth flavor we've described as inherent in the opening ostinato figure. Also note how John's initial stress on G natural here adds a subtle, partly hidden touch of the blues (I'm also very partial to the little rapid-fire 16th note run with which John ends the phrase):

        Paul:   B       B       A   G   A       A

        John:   G       G       E   D   E       EDC#

Bridge

- The bridge is eight measures long and built out of a parallel-style repeat of the same four-measure phrase:

        |D      |-      |-      |E      |
         IV                      V
 

- Bridge-ly contrast is provided by virtually every compositional parameter:

  • the vocal arrangement shifts to straight-away parallel thirds except for a couple of stray eighth notes in which John is left exposed solo for a split second (check out the second syllable of the word "goodbye.")
  • the rhythm section, including the tambourine, shifts away from wrenching syncopation to a pattern of relatively even-handed eighth notes in which the off-beat (on 2 and 4) pattern, first heard from the tambourine in verses, now prevails in the drums.
  • the harmony, even though it features no kind of modulation, does manage to stay entirely away from the I chord, the section ending firmly on the way back towards it.

- A new guitar riff is used at the very end of the section to lead back into the next verse. Its melodic and rhythmic gesture are reminiscent, albeit not slavishly so, of the opening lick. The F# that marks the apex of this new figure makes for yet another added ninth chord here.


Verse Variants

- This song has a higher than average number of small twists applied to the arrangement of its later verse sections. As spontaneous as these details sound to us, I rather suspect that at least some of them were planned quite in advance.

- Here, in the third verse, John adds the word "yeah" to the end of the second line (in addition the one that repeatedly appears at the end of the first line), and he prefaces the third line with an "Oh" (or is it an "aw"?); the latter variation being repeated in the fourth verse as well.

- Ringo provides an evenly beaten sixteenth note pattern as a fill between the second and third lines of the third verse in place of the plain roll he uses elsewhere in the song. In the final verse he plays in this spot no roll nor fill, but only a single whack "on FOUR!".

- One particular variant feature rises above the status of mere detail to assume structural, and perhaps subtextual significance. The hard syncopations mentioned above which so pungently characterize this song are actually found to be very much subdued starting right after the second verse. Granted, we already noted that the bridge itself dispenses with the syncopation as a matter of contrast. But look ahead -- in both of the final verses, Ringo's drumming sticks with the more evenly played eighth note patterns introduced in the bridge instead of returning to the wrenchingly syncopated pattern; this, in spite of the fact that the guitar ostinato (from which his syncopoated patterns were derived in the first place) does continue to make its own appearance. This could hardly have been accidental and I find myself pondering its motivation -- did they discover that the wrenching rhythm when carried all the way through was simply too much of a good thing, or is there some subtle poetry embedded in this change drumming?


Outro

- The question of what manner of poetry may be conveyed by a change of beat is further sharpened by what happens in this outro where the syncopation is loosened even further than it was for the bridge.

- This time, the effect is one of a sudden, free-wheeling, accelerating release of all tension. John would later use a similar effect at the end of "She Said She Said".

- Also here at the very end, the final vocal lick, which is otherwise double-tracked in unison, splits out for an instant to include one last example of a Major second sonority.

SOME FINAL THOUGHTS

- "Ticket To Ride" was recorded after more than a two-month hiatus (11/27 to 2/15) in the Beatles attendance at Abbey Road. One gets used to the song's having been tucked away on the Help! album as the last song on "side 1", but in truth, it was the first song recorded after the Beatles For Sale album was released, and it appeared as the A-side of a single several months before the film was released.

- Once you get the chronology straight in your mind, it's hard to listen to the song without feeling as though you've crossed a frontier. Lewisohn himself comments on this, though his perspective is entirely on the recording process changes that kicked in at this point in time; i.e., the practice of perfecting the rhythm and backing track first before adding everything else on later as overdubs.

- I'm thinking more of style, though whatever compositional innovations are to be found in this song are not without their own irony to the extent that they represent at least as much a return to erstwhile values as much as they do a forward evolution. Yeah, this one looks at least as far ahead as "Day Tripper", but it equally so picks right up where "A Hard Days Night" left off, followed as it was by the anomalistic Beatles For Sale album.

Regards,
Alan (awp@bitstream.com OR uunet!huxley!awp)

---
"I ride this train regularly; twice a week!" 082592#65
---

Copyright (c) 1992 by Alan W. Pollack
All Rights Reserved This article may be reproduced, retransmitted, redistributed and otherwise propagated at will, provided that this notice remains intact and in place.

It's Only Love

3
Your rating: None Average: 3 (1 vote)

Cover versions and notes on The Beatles' song "It's Only Love".

Provenance
Written By: 
Lennon/McCartney
Year: 
1965
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
John Lennon
Cover Versions
Alan W. Pollack's "Notes On"

Notes on "It's Only Love" (IOL)

KEY C Major

METER 4/4

FORM Intro -> Verse -> Refrain -> Verse -> Refrain -> Outro GENERAL POINTS OF INTEREST


Style and Form

- The combination of textural soft-focus with a Moderato tempo is a bit of a departure for John though the elliptical emotional stance of the lyrics is right up his alley.

- The form is structurally both short and simple. To the extent that, as we'll see, the formal boundary between what I've labelled as Verse and Refrain is rather blurred you might argue that the meat of the song be even more compactly described as a repetition of a single larger Verse + Refrain "combo" section.


Melody and Harmony

- Chromatic scale motion, always one of John's favorite hot buttons, has an influence on both melody and harmony in this song; creating here side effects as diverse as cross-relations, augmented triads, and harmonic root movement of a tritone.

- In spite of the relatively small number of chords that are utilized throughout, the song deploys the mildly unusual flat-VII (B flat) in two entirely different contexts; as we'll see, it's the same old chord but with a different meaning, the result of a change in the angle of approach.

- The melodic hooks of the song feature a sighing 6->5 appoggiatura, whether it's the descending guitar lick of the intro/outro, or the main vocal line; in the verse, on the words "(be)side-you", and in the refrain on the word "hard", so to speak.


Arrangement

- The overall sound of the piece is one that is difficult to pigeonhole. You would expect the prominence of the guitar parts and relative absence of percussion to project a Byrds-ey folk rock image, but the hazy finish applied to the final mix works at cross-currents to that.

- The acoustic and electric guitars remain well isolated from each other on the two stereo tracks in spite of all haze. The lead part consists heavily of choppy chords applied to the syncopated off-beats and short melodic fills between the phrases.

- The vocals feature John all the way; single tracked solo in verse, and doubled up in the refrain. The double tracking here sounds more out of synch and less evenly balanced than usual, making me wonder if one of the two vocals is actually the vestige of a "guide vocal" left over from an early take of the backing track.

SECTION-BY-SECTION WALKTHROUGH


Intro

- We have a four-measure intro which economically establishes the instrumental texture, tone, and tonality of the entire song:

        --------------- 2X --------------
        |C              |a              |
C:       I               vi

- The intro, (as well as the outro and part of the refrain) place an almost hook-like emphasis on the I->vi progression, which is an old Beatles trademark starting back as far as "Misery" and running heavily through the 'A side' of _With The Beatles_.


Verse

- Very much like what we saw last time in "I've Just Seen A Face", the verse here is a twelve measure section whose 'AAB' phrasing pattern matches that of the blues even though such a connection is supported by neither the harmony nor the style:

        ------------------------------- 2X ------------------------------
chords: |C      e       |B-flat   F     |G              |G augmented    |
b'line: |C      B       |B-flat   F ...
         I      iii6/4   flat-VII IV     V 4  ->  3      #5

                                         6   -> 5
        |F              |G              |C              |a              |
         IV              V               I               vi

- The downward chromatic bassline at the start "forces" a strange root progression of I->iii->flat-VII. The effect of this is somewhat softened by the linear logic of the bassline itself and the placement of the iii chord in so-called second inversion; try playing the same progression with the iii chord in root position and see how much more strange it sounds.

- Some analysts might even argue in favor of not analyzing our e minor chord here as 'iii' with a Roman numeral per se, as much as they would describe it more simply as the transitory harmonic by-product of linear motion between the two surrounding chords. Again, try imagining the phrase without *any* e minor chord in it, just the C Major chord sustained all the way through the entire first measure, and note how the overall feel of it is still the same.

- The usage of flat-VII sounds here like the "IV-of-IV" variant most familiar to Beatles fans in context of the second half of "Hey Jude".

- A constant low-level of harmonic dissonance abounds, rather evocative of the vague basal uneasiness described in the lyrics. Some of it is logically motivated and clearly resolved; e.g. the 4-3 suspension implied by the lead guitar part in measure 3, and the transient augmented chord caused by chromatic motion, this time upward for a change. Yet, some of it is entirely gratuitous; e.g. the added sixths implied by the vocal part over the F and G chords in the last phrase (on the words "so" and "to/it").

- The first two phrases open out to V; not just a "vanilla" kind of V, but that intensified augmented flavor of it. And this only goes to heighten the sense of musical frustration and backing off that is inherent in the deferred gratification of moving onward from V to IV.

- The ending of the section with our much favored I-vi progression is so open ended in feeling that the dividing line between the verse and refrain is much less clearly articulated than usual.


Refrain

- The refrain is eight measures long and built out of two roughly parallel phrases that are equal in length. The first phrase leads into the second one exactly the same way it itself had been set up by the verse ending. The second phrase leads back toward the following verse with its ending on V:

        |B-flat         |G              |C              |a              |
         flat-VII        V               I               vi

                                         6   -> 5
        |B-flat         |G              |F              |G              |
         flat-VII        V               IV              V

- With the the verse ending on the vi chord (a minor), you'd much sooner expect the first chord of this refrain to be either IV (F) or ii (d); try this out and see how well it actually works. The move to B flat, while not at all unsatisfying *does* work as a surprise, and furthermore sets up a cross-relation when the next chord after it is V (G). This use of flat-VII as a subdominant is something we saw for the first time way back in "All My Loving", of all places. As a device, you might describe it as similar in structure and effect to the gambit in which V-of-V is followed by IV, which also turns out to be a much favored harmonic trick of the Beatles.

- No surprise, by the way, but a tambourine is added for this section to provide some contrast in the instrumental backing.


Outro

- The outro is so smoothly handled that you'd never notice where the seams of it are unless you stopped to analyze it per se. It starts off with a single petit reprise of last half-phrase of the refrain that is stretched out for an extra three of measures by John's falsetto melissma, with the whole thing is capped by the intro redux:

                                        ------- 2X -----
        |F      |G      |C      |a      |C      |a      |C      ||
         IV      V       I       vi      I       vi      I
        |--- reprise ---|---- melissma ---------|
                                        | -- 2nd time: intro ----|

- The resonating reverb and tremelo applied to the the final chord is striking; what more can I say about it ?

SOME FINAL THOUGHTS

- The lyrics of this song are deceptively simple in their outlook and message. We've noted elsewhere (e.g. back in our study of "Yes It Is") John's talent for plumbing the poetic depths that are inherent in the bourgeois cliches of the vernacular, and this one provides yet another fine example. Indeed, if it's "*only* love", then why the exquisite pleasure pain over why it's "so hard"? Right!?

- On a different plane, I seem to remember a possibly apocryphal tale that a certain Mr. Zimmermann has claimed to have been clued in to the fact that Our Own Sweet Boys had begun to "take Tea" by the opening line of this very song. Can one of the biographic fiends of this group shed some light on this one? "I get high ...", really, now.


Regards,
Alan (awp@bitstream.com *OR* uunet!huxley!awp)


---
"She'll only reject me in the end and I'll be froostrated."     011993#74
---

                Copyright (c) 1993 by Alan W. Pollack
                          All Rights Reserved

       This article may be reproduced, retransmitted, redistributed and
       otherwise propagated at will,  provided that this notice remains
       intact and in place.

You Like Me Too Much

2
Your rating: None Average: 2 (1 vote)

Cover versions and notes on The Beatles' song "You Like Me Too Much".

Provenance
Written By: 
George Harrison
Year: 
1965
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
George Harrison
Cover Versions
Alan W. Pollack's "Notes On"

Notes on "You Like Me Too Much" (YLMTM)


  
  KEY     G Major

  METER   4/4

  FORM    Intro -> Verse -> Verse -> Bridge -> Verse -> Break (solo) ->
                          Bridge -> Verse -> Outro (w/complete ending)

GENERAL POINTS OF INTEREST


Style and Form

- George had been granted his first solo shot as a songwriter with "Don't Bother Me" way back on With The Beatles. Amazingly, he had to wait until this one for a second chance. It's up to the biographers to find out if this was the only other thing he had written since then, or if perhaps there is a plethora of "lost" Harrisongs that have been either surpressed, destroyed or are otherwise waiting to be unearthed by the perseveringly enterprising.

- In spite of its superficial resemblances to the Lennon&McCartney songs which surround it in context, YLMTM contains ample substance which attest to its belonging to George, only; especially in its chord progressions and the attitude of its lyrics.

- The form of the song also contains a number of formalistically distinctive earmarks: the apparently ad-lib/slow intro, the deployment of both a bridge and break, and the subtle manner in which verse and bridge ellide with each other in terms of both music and words.


Melody and Harmony

- The entirety of the melody lies within a narrowly constricted range of only six notes; from G only up to E above it. The verse especially has a circular repetitiveness reminiscent of the kind of rut you can wear in a carpet from too much fretful nervous pacing.

- Furthermore, a falling scale fragment permeates the tune as a leitmotif in both verse and bridge. Seemingly by way of contrast, the break uses a chromatic scale fragment which both rises and falls. This chromatic idea also makes unifying appearances at the end of the bridge, as well as in the intro and outro.

- A larger than average number of chords are used here; six out the seven which appear naturally ("diatonically") in the home key (I through vi), plus flat-III, and a couple of secondary dominants (i.e. so-called "V-of..."s).

- But more so than the variety of chords per se, it is in their unusual sequencing that George's particular style is distinguished. The more typical pop song, whether influenced by blues, rock, folk or whatnot, is dominated by clearly teliological chord progressions that start from (and/or move steadily toward) such harmonically conspicuous goals as the tonic (I) or dominant (V). As a result, progressions which lie along the circle of fifths and involve root movement of a fifth upward or downward also typically predominate.

- In contrast, George demonstrates a prediliction for root movements that are stepwise or by thirds. He also likes to defer bringing things to a sense of climax or resolution, and even once he finally reaches the brink of such a payoff, we'll note a tendency for him to step away from it yet one more time; a musical technique and effect which uncannily matches and reflects the strong subtext of vague, ambivalent dissatisfaction which underlies so many of his lyrics.


Arrangement

- The choice of home key and the prominent role of the piano suggest at least a superficial connection between this song and the subject of our previous study, "Tell Me What You See". And indeed, these two songs were recorded at back-to-back sessions.

- The Steinway-reinforced electric piano part provides the song with a rhythmic hook by virtue of its relentless, syncopated accenting of the eighth note in between the second and third beats (on "two-AND"). The piano also freely embellishes many of the chords with added 6ths and 7ths, lending a sightly jazzy flavor to the backing.

- George is vocally double tracked in unison for start of each verse, with a second harmonizing vocal line (either Paul or George overdubbed) added for the title hook line and continuing through most of the bridge. The harmonization is primarily in parallel thirds though a Beatlesque open fourth occasionally is snuck in (e.g. on the final "you" in each verse).

SECTION-BY-SECTION WALKTHROUGH


Intro

- The intro only seems to be slow and out of tempo as an artifact of there being no percussion backbeat behind it. If you compare it carefully with the outro, in which the virtually identical phrase is recapitulated with backbeat, you'll discover the tempi of the two is quite close, with just a small amount of rubato applied to the intro.

- We start off with a drawn-out six measure phrase in which the home key is clearly defined before the song moves on to deal with less direct chord progressions:

        |G      |-      |B-flat  |D      |G      |-      |
G:       I               flat-III V       I

- The use of flat-III right off the bat is unusual enough. When its F-natural is melodically sustained against the following D Major chord (with its concomitant F#) we have a small clash which just might be the most bluesy moment of the entire song.

- A lugubrious touch of reverb is applied in this short passage to one of the keyboard parts and some tremelo to the other one. The latter effect returns in both the break and and outro, but thankfully, the former one is not repeated elsewhere.


Verse

- The verse is sixteen measures long and contains four phrases equal in length. The first two phrases form a couplet followed by a bridge-like third phrase which leads to the closing title hook:

         -------------- 2X --------------
        |a      |-      |C      |G      ||
         ii              IV      I

        |b      |-      |D      |-      ||G     |C      |D      |-      ||
         iii             V                I      IV      V

- In spite of the plentiful supply of 'I' chords in this verse, the harmonic shape of the section is "open" on both ends; both starting and ending away from tonic. Furthermore, the setup of IV via ii and the setup of V via iii are examples of the kind of "weak" or "indirect" chord progressions that I described above as creating a sense of avoidance of harmonic closure.


Bridge

- The demarcation of this bridge as a section distinct from the verses which adjoin it is singnificantly blurred by the flow of the lyrics. The opening bridge line ("I really do") follows seemlessly from the verse ending ("you like me too much and I like you"). Similarly, the ending of the bridge ("If you leave me") moves just as smoothly into the next verse ("I will follow you ...").

- The harmony here, being even more open-ended than the verse on both sides, helps support this sense of formal ellision. In addition, the large number of secondary dominants and some syncopation in the last couple measures create a semi-modulatory feeling of being less than securely grounded. You could parse it as an almost but not quite complete pivot modulation to the key of D except that the end of the section sounds so clearly like big windup on the V chord. Even so, note how the continuation with the next verse (starting on ii) winds up, true to form, leaving the resolution of this V chord deferred until later.

- As a result of all the above, this eight-measure section sounds much less four-square than it would appear to be on paper:

        |e              |-              |A              |-              |
         iii                             V-of-V

        |b              |A              |E      A       |A      D       |
         ii              V-of-V     V-of-V-of-V V-of-V          V

- The melody of this section fails to break the range barriers of the verse, though any potential side-effect of monotony caused by this is balanced out by the striking manner in which the opening of the section broadens out rhythmically.

- One other source of contrast in this bridge is the temporary addition of a tambourine to the backing track.


Break

- The break is a very clever combination play of a 12-bar instrumental blues frame with the four-measure sung title hook phrase grafted on at the end.

- At cross-currents to the underlying blues form, the piano and lead guitar parts trade copycat chromatic scale riffs during the instrumental portion.


Outro

- The outro in introduced, so to speak, by yet one more petit-reprise of the ubiquitous title hook phrase.

- From there on, it's all a rehash of the intro except that this time it's accompanied by the steady support of yer droombeat.

SOME FINAL THOUGHTS

- The lyrics to this song seem to send a mixed message. I mean, if you were on the receiving end of them, would you be convinced in your core that George really "likes" you as unshakably as he professes, or would those reiterated accusations and the recounting of your past misdeeds tend to undermine his claim in your light blue eyes?

- On the one hand, we could debate all night the question of whether this kind of Harrisonian ambiguity is the result of artful design or unintended-yet-unavoidable awkwardness. But, then again, I'm reminded in this regard of a former boss who, when confronted over a bare-faced self-contradiction he had just made, responded that the difference between confusion of mind and complexity of mind or emotion is often merely the thinnest of gray hairs.

Regards,
Alan (awp@bitstream.com OR uunet!huxley!awp)

---
"Oh, you can come off it with us." 110292#68
---

Copyright (c) 1992 by Alan W. Pollack
All Rights Reserved This article may be reproduced, retransmitted, redistributed and otherwise propagated at will, provided that this notice remains intact and in place.

Tell Me What You See

2
Your rating: None Average: 2 (1 vote)

Cover versions and notes on The Beatles' song "Tell Me What You See".

Provenance
Written By: 
Lennon/McCartney
Year: 
1965
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
Paul McCartney
Cover Versions
Alan W. Pollack's "Notes On"

Notes on "Tell Me What You See" (TMWYS)


  
  KEY     G Major

  METER   4/4

  FORM    Intro -> Verse -> Verse -> Bridge -> Verse -> Bridge ->
                            Verse -> Outro (w/complete ending)

GENERAL POINTS OF INTEREST


Style and Form

- In context of some of the more innovative songs of the "Help!/Beatles VI" era, this one is part of a small group of songs that might be described as nice but non-blockbuster. Several by now well-established Beatles trademark devices and novel touches are apparent here at the detailed level; the larger than usual number of cross-references and associations with other Beatles mentioned below indeed seems to reflect this.

- Nonetheless, the overall mood and technique here are relatively simple and straightforward. I'm sure there is at least one of my readers who has been in love with this one since the first time s/he heard it, and that's fine :-) Just remember, I did say it's nice, didn't I ?

- On the surface, the form is yet again the familiar one of two-bridges-but-no-solo, yet the verse section here is unusual in that its second half sounds a bit like refrain; compare this with the earlier example of "Thank You Girl". Even more unusual is the way that a mini-solo is worked into the second half of the bridge itself.


Melody and Harmony

- The song is clearly and unrelievedly in the key of G Major. A recurring emphasis on the flat 7th scale degree (F natural) at the beginning of each bridge lends some touch of the blues, but compared to examples like "A Hard Day's Night" or "Ticket To Ride", this one contains an extremely mild dose it.

- The harmonic diet is very plain, being limited to the major chords of G, C, and D (i.e., I, IV, and V). The G chord that opens the bridge with an F natural in the melody actually functions as a V-of-IV, but regardless of how you parse it, it's still a chord rooted on G.

- Harmonic rhythm is more varied in the service of formal articulation and this somewhat makes up for the small number of chords.


Arrangement

- The prominent solo part for electric piano as well as the several exotic percussion instruments which substitute during most of the proceedings for the usual full drum kit provide quite a bit of novelty to the backing track. This texture also turns the song into the most strongly Latin-flavored of any Beatles original since the days of "Ask Me Why" and "P.S. I Love You".

- The vocal arrangement features two voices throughout, though the two parts alternate frequently between phrases sung in harmony and those sung at the unison or octave. To the extent that the words communicate the kind of desire for loving union that will never accept 'no' for an answer in spite of all distance and other obstacles, this device takes on an almost programmatic significance; the operative phrase in this regard being "we will never be apart if I'm part of you."

- I definitely hear John in there for at least parts of the song, but in some places, I have a hard time determining whether its the Two of Them, or just Paul over-dubbed with himself.

SECTION-BY-SECTION WALKTHROUGH


Intro

- With just two measures of vamping on the I chord (G), the predominant mood and texture is quickly established.

- The music starts a small instant before the downbeat and this subtle gesture has a way of pulling you into the song as if by the hand, so to speak. Compare this to "I'll Cry Instead" and "The Night Before".


Verse

- The verse is sixteen measures long. Though it parses neatly, on one level, into four phrases that are equal in length, the structure here is more accurately described as two eight-measure couplets; the first being verse-like and the second sounding more like a refrain, with its suddenly slower harmonic rhythm and hook-phrase ending:

        |G      C       |D      G       |G      C       |G              |
G:       I      IV       V      I        I      IV       I


        |G      C       |D      G       |C      D       |G              |
         I      IV       V      I        IV     V        I


        |C              |G              |C              |G              |
         IV              I               IV              I


        |C              |G              |C      D       |G              |
         IV              V               IV     V       I
 

- The tune is distinguished by its opening with a dramatic upward leap of an octave and its abundance of appoggiaturas. In terms of shape, it gets rather obsessively stuck around the 5th scale degree (D) and curiously contains no appearance of the 7th scale degree (F#).

- The opening line of the verse (and much else) is scanned so as to place virtually all rhythmic emphasis off the beat. This nicely cuts across the underlying smooth and steady backbeat.

- The vocal arrangement features two-part harmony in first two measures of the first couplet (with John on the tune) but the remainder of this section has them singing in unison.


Bridge

- The bridge is an even eight measures but its structure is unusual. Only three of the four measures in the first phrase are sung, featuring the title phrase declaimed as though it were a kind of categorical imperative. This phrase is rounded out by a fanfare-like riff on the electric piano (featuring a slow triplet, no less), and leads to a second phrase that is entirely instrumental:

        |G              |-              |C              |-              |

        |G              |D              |G              |-              |
 

- Other sources of bridge-ly contrast here are the dramatically still slower harmonic rhythm and the sudden appearance for the first time in the song of the complete drum kit.

- A unifying connection with the music of the verses is found in the continued high quotient of appoggiaturas and that leap upward at the end of the piano solo; a sixth this time instead of an octave, but the gesture still resonates with the tune's opening.


Outro

- The outro is a compressed variation of the bridge in which only the first phrase is presented as modified so as to lead directly to a complete ending.

- The surprise touch of humming without words here at the end had been used to equally satisfying effect by John way back in "All I've Got To Do."

- A peculiar loud amount of hiss can be heard right at the end on the right channel, leading me to suspect that someone must have been caught asleep at the sliding fader switch.

SOME FINAL THOUGHTS

- That the group had a longstanding sweet tooth for the Latin flavor in their cover repertoire can be traced along a trajectory that runs from "Besame Mucho" through "Mister Moonlight" with several other examples coming in between. But you wouldn't neccessarily say the same thing about their repertoire of original songs, especially during the year or so that preceded our current number.

- Granted, during much of '64 they could be seen as branching out into unaccustomed styles and cross-blends, but the marked trends we've noted are in the direction of first bluesy, and later folksy elements. The turning here toward their erstwhile favored Latin beat is at first glance a mildly shocking surprise, or even an anachronism.

- On another level though, you might say this also shows not only a flexible versatility, but even a restless determination to keep trying new things and not repeat themselves overmuch. In perspective of what was first yet to come from them over the next several years, you might call this otherwise simple song yet another clue to the one of several new directions.

Regards,
Alan (awp@bitstream.com OR uunet!huxley!awp)

---
"Oh, you can come off it with us." 100592#67
---

Copyright (c) 1992 by Alan W. Pollack
All Rights Reserved This article may be reproduced, retransmitted, redistributed and otherwise propagated at will, provided that this notice remains intact and in place.

I've Just Seen a Face

4
Your rating: None Average: 4 (1 vote)

Cover versions and notes on The Beatles' song "I've Just Seen a Face".

Provenance
Written By: 
Lennon/McCartney
Year: 
1965
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
Paul McCartney
Cover Versions
Alan W. Pollack's "Notes On"

Notes on "I've Just Seen A Face" (IJSAF)


KEY  A Major

METER        4/4 (2/2, a.k.a. "cut time", may be more accurate)

FORM Intro -> Verse -> Verse -> Refrain ->
                  Verse -> Refrain -> Verse (solo) -> Refrain ->
                     Verse -> Refrain -> Refrain -> Refrain -> Outro

GENERAL POINTS OF INTEREST


Style and Form

- Aside from the delightfully unplugged arrangement, and a greater than ever amount of attention paid to compositional detail, this song manifests a button-busting sense of energy that is timeless and most compelling.

- The form is reasonably clear in some sense, but it's also unusually complicated and would appear to have absorbed the influence of several styles. The two verses in a row near the beginning are pure pop/rock. The strict alternation of verse/refrain in the second half is rather folksy. The triple refrain as an outro is reminiscent of the R&B rave up. And the whole thing is lead off by an extraordinary intro that is not so easily pigeonholed.


Melody and Harmony

- Only four chords are used but this very limited number of them are cleverly deployed so as to alternately suggest two different styles: the pop/rock cliche of I-vi-IV-V in the verses, and the bluesy V-IV-I in the refrains.

- Melodically we find several trademarks yet again: the noodling around within a tight pitch range during the verses, with the headroom freed up somewhat during the refrain. The tune is also shot through with Paul's much favored appoggiaturas; I'll spot you "face" and "place" in the opening phrase, but you've got to find the rest of them on by yourself -- have you no natural resources of yer own ? :-)


Arrangement

- The instrumental texture is most strongly characterized by the folksy sound of several crisply recorded acoustic guitars. And yet, the use of (what sound like to me as) jazzy wire brushes in place of the usual wood sticks for the drum kit, not to mention overdubbed maracas (in the refrains and guitar solo) create subliminal free associations with other styles.

- Paul is closely *single* tracked for a change on the lead vocal, the more intimately for us to feel the slight quiver in his voice. During the refrains, he provides his own contrapuntal backing part in the same nasally affected C&W voice used to back Ringo in "Act Naturally."

SECTION-BY-SECTION WALKTHROUGH


Intro

- This fully instrumental introduction is unusually long and musically involved. On the one hand, it features an oscillating motif in slow triplets that never shows up again for the remainder of the piece. And yet, the long scalar bassline whose full octave span stretches out over the complete length of the intro has embedded within its ending the ubiquitous "La-da-da da'n'da" hook phrase (i.e. D->C#->B AG#->A).

- The slow triplet pulse creates a deceptive sense of tempo. When the verse finally kicks in with its four-square beat that is sustained for the remainder of the song you have a gear-shifting feeling of acceleration as though the tempo had changed. But this is entirely an illusion, anticipating what would show up later, even more forecefully, in "We Can Work It Out". If you count the measures in "two half" time instead of the twice-as-fast 4/4 you'll more easily grasp the extent to which the underlying tempo is constant.

- The illusion of acceleration is abbeted by the phrasing. The intro has an unusual ten-measure length and is built out of three phrases, the last one of which is foreshortened and thus "hastens" the arrival of the first verse. In any event, this feeling of speed is one that is particularly effective in the song's album-opening context of the 'American' _Rubber Soul_ line-up where you feel drawn straight into the entire LP by it, not just the first song.

- Harmonically, the song opens subtly away from the home key but quickly converges upon it. Even though the bassline line starts off, unaccompanied, with the pitch of the home key, the first chord is f# and until you reach the end of this section the sense of harmonic grounding is quite suspended; similar to, though not quite as intense as, the opening of "Help!".

- In order to better elucidate the truly fine detail of this intro, I've included in the schematic below a precis of both the bassline and top voice along with the usual harmonic information. In the latter department note the unusual sonority created in measures 6 and 7 by the "non-harmonic" passing tones, and the handling of the E chord in measures 9 and 10 with an appoggiatura instead of the the root note in the bass:

top-most line:  |F#     |A      |C#     |F#     |
chords:         |f#     |-      |-      |-      |
bassline:  A G# |F#     |-      |-      |-   E  |
A Major:         vi

top-most line:  |D      |E      |F#     |-      |
chords:         |D      |- 9/6/4|- 7    |-      |
bassline:       |D      |-      |-      |-   C# |
                 IV
                 
                                |verse --->
top-most line:  |E      |D      |C#
chords:         |E 6/4  |- susp |A
bassline:       |B      |A   G# |A
                 V               I


Verse

- The verse is blues-influenced to the extent that its form is twelve measures long, consists of three phrases, and its harmonic rhythm is mostly slow throughout. Note, though, that the chord progression used is distinctly *pop*:

        |A      |-      |-      |-      ||f#    |-      |-      |-      ||
         I                                vi

        |D      |-      |E      |A      ||
         IV              V       I

- The first two phrases are virtually identically, tune-wise, though they sound different simply because of the chord change, not to mention the unfolding lyrics.

- The bassline motif of the intro is continued here albeit abbreviated in length. In measures 3-5 the tune marches down the scale in parallel 10ths with the bass, but note how the same basic idea idea in measures 7-9 makes for parallel 5ths!


Refrain

- The refrain is eight measures long and parses into a couplet of two short phrases that are balanced out by one longer one ('AAB'):

        |E      |-      |D      |-      |A      |D      |A      |-      |
         V               IV              I       IV      I

- The chord progression and the unique appearance within the song of a melodic minor 3rd (on the first syllable of the word 'calling') give this section a slightly more bluesy feel than the rest of what surrounds it.


Solo

- The solo is an almost slavish replicate of the tune, but one that is cleverly transformed in character by the Countrified, rhythmically flat rendering of it.

- The slight departure from the tune in the final three measures (the guitar melodically harmonizing a 3rd below where the tune itself should be) is a most welcome variations, especially as it is followed by that 'bon mot' flourish one octave up right at the end.


Outro

- The use of a triple repeat to signal the approaching end of a song is quite a well-worn Beatles trademark. We're used to seeing this trick used on the scale of a 'petit reprise' of a phrase no longer than two to four measures in length. The repeat here of an entire eight bar chorus is rather unprecedented.

- There's an unusual and shameless bit of "stumbling" word painting in the final repeat where Paul throws in that extra "oh!" and sounds literally as though falling; but it works quite nicely.

- The last refrain runs out into a little instrumental reprise that is redolent with associations to what we had heard earlier on in the song. Primarily, we have a snippet of the last part of the intro which adds a bookend formal symmetry and allows the song to be ultimately summarized by its "La-da-da da'n'da" hook phrase. But even that final strummed guitar chord seems to resonate with what I had described as the 'bon mot' ending of the solo section.

SOME FINAL THOUGHTS

- By this point they had been freely borrowing and blending various stylistic elements of pop, rock, folk, blues, and still other styles for quite a while. Still, this otherwise sweetly simple "folk rock" song really pushes the envelope in terms of the sheer number of diverse styles juggled simultaneously as well as the effortlessly seamless manner in which they are fused.

- In the final result though, if resonance has any thing to do with why you find this song enduring, I'll bet it's not so much in scholarly terms of style, but rather in those not so easily verbalized ones of your own experience. If you are, let's say, of the type who, when romantically enthused (you should only be so lucky!), tends to start talking rapidly, getting all inarticulate and muckle mouthed about it in the bargain, then you're likely to find Paul's patter-song-like syllabic delivery of the words of this song, up to and including his momentary retreats into scat phonemes, rather apropos, maybe even truly inspired.


Regards,
Alan (awp@bitstream.com *OR* uunet!huxley!awp)


---
"I want all the world to see we've met."                        010593#73
---                                                             H   B   s

                Copyright (c) 1993 by Alan W. Pollack
                          All Rights Reserved

       This article may be reproduced, retransmitted, redistributed and
       otherwise propagated at will,  provided that this notice remains
       intact and in place.

Yesterday

0
Your rating: None

Cover versions and notes on The Beatles' song "Yesterday": the most covered song of all time.

Provenance
Written By: 
Lennon/McCartney
Year: 
1965
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
Paul McCartney
Cover Versions
Videos
Alan W. Pollack's "Notes On"

Notes on "Yesterday" (Y)

KEY F Major

METER 4/4

FORM Intro -> Verse -> Verse -> Bridge ->

Verse -> Bridge -> Verse -> Outro

GENERAL POINTS OF INTEREST

 


Style and Form

- This song is so well established in the pop-cultural subconscious that it's difficult to relate to it objectively, no less say something new and insightful about it, but we'll try.

- As is often the case with the over-exposed war horses of any artsy genre, whether or not you "like" this song, there's some good reason *why* it became so over-exposed in the first place. (hint) It's a fine piece of work with something going for it in virtually every department: the unique arrangement, an attractive tune, even some asymmetrical phrasing and a couple of offbeat chord progressions.

- By the same token, one should not be fooled by whatever unique and interesting factors surround the song's history and production into thinking of it as more unique and different than it is. Especially if you can step around the self-pitying lyrics for a moment (Paul possibly taking a lesson from George, for a change) you'll find this song to actually lie along the same compositional and moody lines of the other hymn or anthem-like ballads which so vividly characterize some of Paul's highest achievements, especially in the post-Pepper period.

- Just for the record, the form here is the shorter two bridge model. And the tempo is uncharacteristically slow.

 


Melody and Harmony

- The melodic phrases are consistently arch shaped and shot through with sentimentally expressive appoggiaturas; very dangerously close to being too much so. Ultimately, I believe it's the free-verse, non-four-square scanning of the words that saves it.

- The overall home key is F Major but the music demonstrates a curious tendency to repeatedly veer off toward the relative minor key of d. This device subtly sets a mood for the song in which all attempts at putting on a positive face are betrayed by pervasive melancholy; shades of "beneath this mask I am wearing a frown." Interestingly, Paul had used a similar harmonic trick (actually the same basic idea but in reverse) in his very similar earlier offering of "And I Love Her."

- By funny coincidence, we find here the same harmonic cross-relation between G and B-flat chords as we saw last time in "It's Only Love." Granted, the order of the two chords is reversed here, and the semantic meaning of the progression is changed by the difference in home key between the two songs. It's an uncanny parallel, nevertheless.

 


Arrangement

- The instrumental backing consists entirely of acoustic guitar and a string quartet (2 violins, viola, and cello), with the two elements mixed 100% apart from each other onto separate stereo channels and the vocal split down the middle. Paul is single tracked virtually all the way through except for a short patch of double tracking to reinforce the high notes at the end of the first bridge. To my ears (especially when isolating the "right" channel with acoustic guitar, it sounds like there was some intermittent reverb applied to the vocal track.

- Even without the usual electric guitars and drums, some standard tricks still apply; to wit, the layered effect of holding back on the bowed strings until the second verse, and the manner in which the quartet never plays the same section exactly the same way more than once. Regarding the latter effect, note for example the ominous interjection by the viola (or cello ?) in the second bridge, and the sustained high note in the first violin during the final verse, the latter, a terrific anticipation of the similar effect created for the second half of "Hey Jude."

- As with those other hymns of Paul's, the bassline of this one is played with special emphasis, whether in those slappingly hard-picked notes on the low strings of the guitar or reinforced by the cello.

SECTION-BY-SECTION WALKTHROUGH

 


Intro

- The intro consists of just two measures of guitar vamping on an open-fifth drone-like scoring of the I chord, minus the third scale degree whose presence would otherwise make explicit whether we're dealing with a Major or minor key. This seemingly small detail starts the proceedings off on a suspenseful, ambiguous note.

 


Verse

- The verse is an unusual seven measure in length and divides up into three phrases which form a 3+2+2 poetic meter: 

      |F                 |e-dim    A        |d                 |
   F:  I                  ii-of-vi V-of-vi   vi

      |B-flat   C        |F                 |
       IV       V         I

      |d        G        |B-flat   F        |
       vi       V-of-V    IV       I

 - As mentioned above, the music harmonically retreats off to relative minor key of d even before the Major home key of F has been properly established. The arrival on the d minor chord in the third measure is, indeed, the first instant in the song in which you feel a sense of being harmonically grounded, the opening F chord at this stage of the game still not at all clear to you, even in retrospect, as the chord of the home key.

- The chord progression in which V-of-V is followed by IV, with its concommitant cross-relation and implied ethos of deferred gratification makes a somewhat surprising appearance here at the end of the verse. This progression was always very popular with both Lennon and McCartney, but we're used to finding it in the faster and harder driving likes of "She Loves You", "Eight Days A Week", and the title cut of "Sgt. Pepper." In the current instance, the effect of the cross-relation is somewhat blunted by the tracing, in one of the inner voices of the backing, a Barber Shop Harmony-like descending chromatic line which also happens to be intrinsic to this chord progression.

- Of course there are extremely juicy appoggiaturas on the first syllable of the opening word as as well as the words "far", and "here".

 


Bridge

- On paper, the bridge is eight measures long and built out of two four-measure phrases, but it sure as hell doesn't sound that way! It sounds much more to our ears as each phrase of the bridge begins on what I've notated as the second measure below, with the first measure being a wind-up extension of the previous phrase:

 	--------------------------------- 2X ------------------------------- 
	|e dim.    A        |d      B-flat	|g	C	|F          |
 	 ii-of-vi  V-of-vi   vi     VI		 ii	V	 I 

- The phrase endings of this section are the only place in the song where the home key is clearly established by a clean Dominant-Tonic (i.e. V-I) cadence. The starting off in this bridge, yet again, from the harmonic perspective of the relative minor key makes these phrase endings in F sound almost as much like the end result of a modulation *away* from the home key rather than the a true return to it; doubly ironic because of the extent to which the chords used in this section overlap so heavily with those of the verse.

- The end of the second bridge features a lovely melodic variation. In the first iteration of this section Paul sustains the high F (on the syllable "day .....") with one of the strings playing a descending counter-melody (F-C-B-flat-A) against him. In the second bridge, Paul now includes that subordinate phrase as part of the main line.

- Note too the stepwise descending bassline which spans measures 2-3 of each phrase in this section.

 


Outro

- The outro contains just a single reprise of the final phrase scored as yet another hum job.

- For just this last time, the descending chromatic inner line is used to accompany the vocal line minus the supporting bassline below it.

SOME FINAL THOUGHTS

- The scoring for string quartet and acoustic guitar is truly inspired. By the time this song appeared, the Beatles had well established their flair for creating stylistic hybrids from surprisingly diverse elements; yet this one is more than just another crossover.

- In this case, there is an ironic tension drawn between the schmaltzy content of what is played by the quartet and the restrained, spare nature of the medium in which it is played.

- The cross-current set off by this effect adds an engaging level of depth to the performance. But more importantly, it provides an antidote in advance for any possibly perceived surfeit of sentiment; a key point that has so often been overlooked by those who, with the best of intentions, seek to cover the song, and thereby "ruin it", with a backing in the mode of The 101 Strings.

Regards,

Alan (awp@bitstream.com *OR* uunet!huxley!awp)

---
"She'll only reject me in the end and I'll be frustrated."	020193#75
---

                Copyright (c) 1993 by Alan W. Pollack
                          All Rights Reserved

       This article may be reproduced, retransmitted, redistributed and
       otherwise propagated at will,  provided that this notice remains
       intact and in place.
--
>
> Francois Pachet writes:
> I was very surprised to see that yo do not mention a detail that, as far
> as I am concerned, embodies my overall perception of "Yesterday" :
> There is a very strange (and interesting) seventh (E flat in the key of F)
> played by the cello, in the middle of the bridge. I read somewhere that this
> was actually an explicit request of MacCartney to the arranger (G. Martin ?)
> The corresponding cello line is awkward, and I would like to hear your
> opinion about it.
>

There's virtually no end of the level of detail to which one might go with the style of analysis used in the Notes. Partly in order to keep my own pace moving, and partly in consideration of the fact that there are some who likely find the Notes *already* too long, it's no wonder a salient point or two worth making sometimes is overlooked.

In this case, I thought I actually *had* makde passing reference to the "ominous intrusion" of that E flat in the cello part. In any event, though, let's use the opportunity here to backtrack and add a couple of footNotes to the original post:

- As a stylistic hybrid, the use of classical and pop elements figures most heavily in the mix, but there are other elements as well:

For example, that E-flat in the cello is the only occurence in the entire song of the flat 7th melodic degree and, showing up so late, lends an isolated, even surprising touch of the blues.

Similarly, the G Major chord used in the verse, aside from the cross-relation it creates with the B flat chord that follows it, conjures a folksy Dorian modal tone a la "Parsley, etc." with the d minor chord that *precedes* it.

I'd even go so far as to suggest that the manner in which the melodic note A is pitted against the ii-of-vi chord at the start of the bridge is somewhat jazzy.

- On an entirely different note, there is a deft moment near the end of the verse where the harmonic rhythm is uniquely syncopated. This both breaks up what otherwise might have become the monotonous flowing of the rest of the music and, to the extent that it appears in every verse as well as the outro, it provides a subtle, non-verbal hook for the piece.

  Alan (awp@bitstream.com *OR* uunet!huxley!awp)