Beatles for Sale

4
Your rating: None Average: 4 (1 vote)
Album Information
Album Cover Art
By: 
The Beatles
Released: 
Fri, 1964-12-04
Album Type: 
Original
Songs
On Amazon
Sales Rank: 
26
Most-Covered Songs

No Reply

3
Your rating: None Average: 3 (1 vote)
Provenance
Written By: 
Lennon/McCartney
Year: 
1964
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
John Lennon
Cover Versions

I'm a Loser

3
Your rating: None Average: 3 (1 vote)
Provenance
Written By: 
Lennon/McCartney
Year: 
1964
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
John Lennon
Cover Versions

Baby's in Black

2
Your rating: None Average: 2 (1 vote)

Cover versions and notes on The Beatles' song "Baby's in Black".

Provenance
Written By: 
Lennon/McCartney
Year: 
1964
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
Lennon/McCartney
Cover Versions
Alan W. Pollack's "Notes On"

Notes on "Baby's In Black" (BIB)

KEY A Major

METER 3/4

FORM Intro -> Refrain -> Verse -> Refrain -> Verse -> Bridge -> Refrain -> Refrain (guitar solo) -> Bridge -> Refrain -> Verse -> Refrain (w/complete ending)

GENERAL POINTS OF INTEREST


Style and Form

- Formalistically, this is among the more verbose and complicated songs we've looked at, with its refrain, bridge, and guitar solo sections. While The Beatles didn't go in for this sort of thing very often, neither is such a form unprecedented. Examples uncovered thus far in our studies include "It Won't Be Long", "When I Get Home", and "You're Going To Lose That Girl". The fact that the preceding list is entirely built out of songs that conspicuously belong to John would seem noteworthy.

- Stylistically, the song has an unusual mishmash of elements -- the bluesy tune and choice of chords; the folksy almost hillbilly vocal arrangement; not to mention the exotic touch in the final verse where those drone-like open fifths in the bass parts conjure, to my ears, a strange musical cross between Scottish bagpipes and an Indian tamboura.

- John described it as a waltz (check his spoken lead into the song at the Paris concerts in January '65), but in spite of the 3/4 time signature, the rapid tempo and agitated mood of the piece seem out of character with that romantic dance form.


Melody and Harmony

- The melodic mode is almost entirely Major with the exception of some intermittment use of the bluesy minor third in the refrain.

- Very few chords are used throughout and the song remains firmly rooted in the initial home key. The refrain and verse sections limit themselves to the familiar I-IV-V chords. Although the bridge adds in the vi and V-of-V for variety, its still all simple stuff.

- The one notable harmonic detail is the familiar Beatles trademark of directly following V-of-V with IV instead of V. Early and contemporary examples of this are to be found in "She Loves You", "I Call Your Name", and "Eight Days A Week".


Arrangement

- There's an unusual unrelieved end-to-end vocal duet with John on bottom and Paul on top. This relative lack of textural variety here increases the tension and intensity of the mood. Note though how in spite of the predominance of parallel thirds in the two voice parts, there are several places in which they subtly branch out into a more typically Lennon/McCartney kind of counterpoint; check out the end of the refrain and the opening of the bridge.

- The instrumental texture is similarly consistent throughout, though in a wise attempt to avoid monotony and provide a bit of contrast, they make a temporarily radical change to the backing for the final verse before resuming the original texture for the closing refrain; an effect which would be repeated with equal success in "Help!".

SECTION-BY-SECTION WALKTHROUGH


Intro

- The intro is a scant four measures long and creates the effect of your having walked in on the middle of the song, just as it was coming out of a refrain section:

        |A      |E      |A      |-      |
A:       I       V       I

- The guitar hook heard right at the beginning anticipates a key phrase of the tune ("Oh, what can I do") and provides a means of unification from the way it is repeated at the end of every refrain except for the second one. The fourth refrain, by the way, presents the guitar hook in a different range than elsewhere, and I have a hard time deciding weather this is avoidance of foolish consistency or just sloppy playing.


Refrain

- The refrain is twelve measures long and is built out of three phrases equal in length:

        |A      |-      |E      |-     ||D      |-      |E      |-      ||
A:       I               V               IV              V

        |A      |D      |A      |-      |
         I       IV      I

- The melodic shape is an inverted arch. The harmonic shape is closed. The chords are the familiar I-IV-V of the blues form though the progression pattern is far from the traditional one of that form.


Verse

- The verse is an unusual fourteen measures long and built out of three phrases whose number of measures create an asymmetrical pattern of 4+4+6:

        |A      |-      |-      |-      |
         I

        |A      |-      |D      |-      |
         (V-of-IV)       IV

        |D      |-      |A      |E      |A      |-      |
                         I       V       I

- Again, the harmonic shape of the section is closed, though the strategy of the chords *not* changing on the phrase boundaries creates a subtle sense of freedom.

- For those who are keeping score of such things, note the "and/but" word collision in the final verse. This one is even picked up by the compilers of the lyrical concordance, "Things We Said Today". However, I believe that if you listen carefully, it also sounds like their is another collision (this time on "he/she") immediately following, though this one sounds as though it is perhaps a residue from an earlier guide vocal track that they were trying to mix out.


Bridge

- The bridge is eight measures long and would appear on the surface to be made up of two phrases equal in length:

        |f#     |-      |B      |-      |D      |-      |E      |-      ||A
         ii              V-of-V          IV              V                I

- Actually, the second phrase carries all the way through into the beginning of the ninth measure, where it makes a striking ellision with the start of the next refrain. It's an unusual example of this technique, even for the Boys, because even the *words* here are ellided at the point where the two sections intersect; e.g. "made...dear" instead of "Oh, dear".

- The overall melodic range is cleverly managed. The frequently repeated refrain contains the unique low point of the tune, but it also reiterates a constricted high point on the pitch 'E' almost to the point of monotony. The verse sections open the high end up as far as 'G', but these sections even more so emphasize the same harping on 'E' heard in the refrains. The climactic peak of the song (on the pitch 'A') is held back and dramatically released right at the start of the bridge.


Guitar Solo

- For a guy who made such a specialty of the well-practiced kind of solo that is the most understated delicate paraphrase of the tune, George really lets go here with a solo whose only obvious connection to the original refrain melody is to be found in the lilting cadence of its rhythmic pattern. Otherwise, in place of the predominantly stepwise melodic arch performed by the singers, we get a guitar part that is not only full of long jumps, but is also peppered through with bent notes and free dissonances against the underlying chords; all in all, a worthy contrast with the surrounding sections.

SOME FINAL THOUGHTS

- To the extent that the common wisdom seems to obssess on the "downbeat" mood of the _For Sale_ album, I suppose that its the implicitly lugubrious nature of the words to "Baby's In Black" that may have contributed more so to this phenomenon than any one other song.

- Personally, I've never been swayed too much by that. For one thing, it has always seemed easy enough to simply interpret the mourning described in the lyric as figurative, rather than literal. And when all else fails, I still find it difficult to get hung about a song that sounds so similar in a way to the traditional folk ditty, "Oh dear what can the matter be?"; no matter *how* gamey the words may be :-).

Regards,
Alan (awp@bitstream.com *OR* uunet!huxley!awp)


---
"How do you like your girlfriends to dress ?                 061692#59
---

                Copyright (c) 1992 by Alan W. Pollack
                          All Rights Reserved

       This article may be reproduced, retransmitted, redistributed and
       otherwise propagated at will,  provided that this notice remains
       intact and in place.

Mr. Moonlight

1
Your rating: None Average: 1 (1 vote)
Provenance
Written By: 
Roy Lee Johnson
Year: 
1962
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
John Lennon
Cover Versions

Kansas City/Hey-Hey-Hey-Hey

3
Your rating: None Average: 3 (1 vote)

Medley of "Kansas City" and "Hey-Hey-Hey-Hey".

Provenance
Written By: 
Lieber and Stoller
Year: 
1952
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
Paul McCartney
Cover Versions

Eight Days a Week

3
Your rating: None Average: 3 (1 vote)

Cover versions and notes on The Beatles' song "Eight Days a Week".

Provenance
Written By: 
Lennon/McCartney
Year: 
1964
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
Lennon/McCartney
Cover Versions
Alan W. Pollack's "Notes On"

Notes On "Eight Days a Week" (EDAW)

Copyright 1989 Alan W. Pollack
All Rights Reserved

The harmony of "Eight Days A Week" is built out of a wonderfully teasing exploitation of the special effect called a "false (or "cross") relation". This harmonic idiom is used quite a bit throughout the Beatles' output and I think that EDAW is an object lesson worth exploring.

("Hey, I thought he'd talk about those infamous parallel fifths, but this false relations stuff sounds *really* kinky!")


False Relations, Defined

A false relation is nothing more than a chromatic contradiction between two notes in a single chord or in different parts of adjacent chords. Within the confines of academic tonal theory this is considered a "syntax error" but it has been used throughout the ages by composers for expressive effect; a sort of a musical poetic license.

As my one sentence definition above implies, false relations come in two flavors; both are well loved by the Beatles and I'll cite examples of each though only the second flavor is of concern in EDAW:

1. contradiction between two notes in one chord -- the manifestation of this seen most frequently is the simultaneous use of the major and minor 3rd in a chord; this is one of the factors which makes the blues sound, well, bluesy. A Beatle example off the top of the head is "The Night Before"; the accompaniment is clearly in D major (which uses F#) while the melody repeatedly incorporates the F-natural of the minor mode.

2. contradiction between adjacent chords -- this is the more subtle of the two flavors because the ear picks it up only by following the succession of two chords over time, whereas the flavor #1 above involves an outright, instantaneous clash. As we'll see, the pervasive application of this effect provides a unifying influence on EDAW.


False Relations Located in EDAW

False relations appear in both the verse and refrain of EDAW. The song is in D-major and the false relation in each case involves G-natural and G#; note that The G-natural has a melodic tendency to fall to F# and the G# has the tendency toward A-natural.

- the verse -- each phrase of the verse has its own false relation. Here's phrase 1 ("Love you every day, girl ..."):

	D-Maj		->E-Maj		->G-Maj		->D-Maj
			(uses G#)	(uses G-natural)

	I		V of V		  IV		I

The effect is particularly subtle because the G# in second chord appears in a middle voice while the G-natural in the following chord is in the outer voices.

In phrase 2 ("Hold me...") the false relation does not happen between immediately adjacent chords but the alternating appearance of G#/G-natural is definitely heard:

	B-min		->E-min		->B-min		->E-Major
			(uses G-natural)		(uses G-major)

	VI		II6		VI		V of V
			  3

I would argue that the false relation is accentuated in the above phrase by the fact that the E-minor chord appears in its first inversion with the G-natural in the bass line!

- the refrain -- ("Eight Days A Week ...") - the progression is as follows with the false relation hopefully clearly spelled out:

	A-Maj		->B-min		->E-Maj		->G-Maj		->A7
					(G#)		(G-natural)

	V		VI		V of V		IV		V

Other Harmonic Teases

EDAW makes very spare use of the dominant chord ("V"), and even when it does appear it doesn't always behave as we might expect. A couple of details (referring the chord progressions outlined above):

- the V chord's first appearance is delayed all the way until the refrain; it doesn't make any appearance in the verse which is a particular tease in that the E-Major chord ("V of V") would seem to prompt for it.

- the first appearance of the V chord at the beginning of the refrain resolves "deceptively" to the VI chord instead of the tonic (I). The V of V in the second part of the refrain finally moves to the V itself but *by way* of the false-relation-inducing IV chord.

- the return of the verse following the refrain, then, is the only place in the song that we have a garden variety V-I cadence. In other words, the verses by themselves rely on the IV-I (so-called Plagal cadence) to establish the key.

- Anybody out there notice that the unique triplet-rhythm phrase which is used both in the (fade-in!!) intro and coda happens to use the same chord progression as the beginning of the verse but over a D pedal tone ? (It's kind of like a Bach Prelude.)


... and one last thing

Lest any of you think I'm some dessicated pedant who derives no joy from the music let me share with you: I was in 11th grade when this song first came out. I was a regular Schroder-from-the-Peanuts-cartoon who was into classical music and eschewed virtually all popular music. To make a long story short, I can still remember (and experience) the hair on the back of my neck standing up when I hear(d) those parallel 5ths/4ths in the break. So there :-).

BTW, I assume a certain basic knowledge of musical notation and theory in these articles. Please don't hesitate to send e-mail if you have any questions or suggestions on how to make them more intelligible.


Alan (awp@mirror.tmc.com)

---
"They tried to fob you off on this musical charlatan,
 but *I* gave him the test."

Honey Don't

3
Your rating: None Average: 3 (1 vote)

"Honey Don't" is a song by Carl Perkins (singing below) that was covered by The Beatles, with Ringo on lead vocal.

Provenance
Written By: 
Carl Perkins
Year: 
1956
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
Ringo Starr
Cover Versions
Alan W. Pollack's "Notes On"

"Honey Don't" is a song by Carl Perkins that was covered by The Beatles, with Ringo on vocals.

Every Little Thing

2
Your rating: None Average: 2 (1 vote)
Provenance
Written By: 
Lennon/McCartney
Year: 
1964
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
Lennon/McCartney
Cover Versions

What You're Doing

2
Your rating: None Average: 2 (1 vote)
Provenance
Written By: 
Lennon/McCartney
Year: 
1964
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
Paul McCartney
Cover Versions

Everybody's Trying to Be My Baby

3
Your rating: None Average: 3 (1 vote)
Provenance
Written By: 
Carl Perkins
Year: 
1957
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
George Harrison
Cover Versions