Please Please Me (album)

5
Your rating: None Average: 5 (1 vote)
Album Information
Album Cover Art
By: 
The Beatles
Released: 
Fri, 1963-03-22
Album Type: 
Original
Songs
On Amazon
Sales Rank: 
17
Most-Covered Songs

I Saw Her Standing There

3
Your rating: None Average: 3 (1 vote)

Cover versions and notes on The Beatles' song "I Saw Her Standing There".

 

Provenance
Written By: 
Lennon/McCartney
Year: 
1963
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
Paul McCartney
Cover Versions
Alan W. Pollack's "Notes On"

Notes on "I Saw Her Standing There" (ISHST)

In contrast with the post-skiffle beat of songs like "Love Me Do" and "Misery" or even "From Me To You" and "Thank You Girl", ISHST is one of the Boys' first hard, fast rockers; it was probably the most blazingly original song they had yet written at the time of its recording, and appropriately and auspiciously, they chose to crown it with the lead-off spot on their first album.

More importantly for our purposes here, the words, music, and arrangement of this song are replete with the touches and techniques that in retrospect define the early "sound" of the group, making it a prime choice for our detailed study.


Words

The lyrics of the first three verses and bridge section contain a deceptively simple boy-meets-girl narrative to which the pulsating music lends a definitely hot connotation, in spite of the lack of any explicit passion in the words. There are many other songs in the world which describe this discovering of one's special love across a crowded room or at a dance, but ISHST is a very far cry indeed from the likes of Rodgers @amp; Hammerstein's "Some Enchanted Evening" or Bernstein's "Maria"; as absurd as this association of titles sounds at first, you cannot deny the uncanny parallels among their respective scenarios.

We also have early examples here of a type of wordplay that would be looked back upon as a Beatles trademark; i.e., the successive use of "How", "She", and "I" at the beinning of the third line of each verse, and the alternation between "when" and "since" at the beginning of the final line of each verse. This device was sufficiently clever to trip up the composers themselves, primarily John. Not only are several of the outtakes riddled by word collisions, but a couple of such mishaps actually managed to creep into the official version; listen to "when/since" at the end of the third verse, or John's hesitation with "since" in the last verse.


Harmony and Form

The song is, and always has been played in the key of E Major; Paul still did it this way on his '89 tour. It must have been a particularly playable key for them in terms of vocal range and chord choices, because they used it so frequently in their early string of original compositions. A non-exhaustive list of examples includes "Please Please Me", "Do You Want To Know A Secret", "There's A Place", "It Won't Be Long", and "All My Loving." Talk about being "tuned to a natural E!"

Though not strictly a blues song, there is nonetheless, a strong bluesy flavor here created by the almost exclusive reliance on the I-IV-V chords, the slow harmonic rhythm with its infrequent chord changes, and the many blue notes in the vocal line which pit melodic notes from the minor mode against the Major chords in the accompaniment; i.e., the tune has a relatively large number of G and D naturals in it for a song in the key of four sharps. Only one truly unusual chord is used in the song, C Major, and it appears with strategic effectiveness right at the climax of each verse where the voices go into their falsetto "wooh".

The form is quite fully cranked out with two bridges, a guitar solo, intro, and full outro, thus making the it run a comparitively long 2:52 as a result:

Intro -> Verse -> Verse -> Bridge -> Verse -> Verse (solo) -> Bridge -> Verse -> Outro (w/complete ending)

The song evokes such a pleasurably exuberant mood that I don't believe anyone these days ever finds it to drag or to be too long in its full form; if anything, the outstretched symmetry is one of its best features. Interestingly though, if you bother to study the long line of live versions of the song performed for broadcast or in concert, you'll discover that at some point, they felt compelled to shorten it up by dropping the second bridge.


Arrangement

Throughout, there's a delightful tension embedded in the song from the way that the slowness of the chord changes contrasts with the hard driving activity of the rhythm track and the frequent long jumps in the voice parts. There are several more specific trademark sources of excitement in the arrangement to which the entire group contributes:

- Paul's boogie-woogie bassline outlines the chords in a perpetual motion of eighth notes.

- Ringo's elaboratly syncopated drum fills typically appear in the space between phrases or sections.

- The backing work on rhythm and lead guitars works in fine synergy with the bass and drum parts. George's little obligatto riffs which fill the space between phrases sound a little more tentative than necessary, but you'd miss them if they weren't there. When you work your way through the many later concert and broadcast versions of this song, you find that over time, George *does* in fact come out of his shell a bit, and plays these fills with greater confidence and elaboration.

- The appearance of a full-length improvisatory guitar solo is notable to the extent that instrumental solos of any kind are relatively uncommon on the early singles and albums; the few that do appear tend more toward light- handed embellishment of the main tune (viz. "Love Me Do" or "From Me To You"). Granted, there are those who will argue that George's performance here sounds a tad too stiff and pre-arranged to have been made up in real time, but the point is, it's *intended* to sound as though improvised.

- The tight vocal harmonies of Paul and John, which we will look at below in detail, feature a type of counterpoint which is conspicuously unlike the simpler parallel thirds or sixths of acts like the Everly Brothers. Even the falsetto used here seems so bracingly different from what was to be heard from other contemporaneous groups who made a habit of it, such as The Beach Boys or The Four Seasons. If you can sightread John's parts from my notation below, I recommend you try singing them along with the record for a good time.

- The handclaps and the screaming used for background punctuation are unessential yet nevertheless characteristic.

As always, however, it is only in a thorough walkthrough of the entire song that all the details can be fully appreciated.


Intro

The intro is a simple four measures of vamping on the tonic chord of E, but the count-in, the eighth note pickup in the bass, and the generally rhythmic texture of the accompaniment all help to set, from the very outset, the energetic tone of what is to follow.


Verses - "She was just seventeen.../She looked at me.../We danced all night..."

The verse is in a standard structure of sixteen measures with four phrases of equal length:

      m.1				 5
	|E	|-	|A	|E	||-	|-	|B	|-	||
E:	 I		 IV	 I			 V

	9				 13
	|E	|-	|A	|C	||E	|B	|E	|-	||
	 I	 **	 IV	flat VI	  I	 V	 I


	[** bass players will want to note that Paul often but not always
	    makes sure that E chord in measure 10 is supported by G# in the
	    bass which allows the bassline to melodically move stepwise to
	    the A of the following measure.]

As often happens, the harmony plays an important role in the articulation of the dramatic shape of such a verse: the first phrase expositorily establishes the key, the second phrase reinforces this sense of key with its open ending on V, the third builds towards a climax with its ending on the C chord, and the fourth phrase finally resolves all accumlated tension with its straightforward re-establishment of the home key.

That C Major chord is actually not native to E Major, and in analytical terms is said to have been "borrowed" from the parallel key of e minor. When it moves either from or to the E chord, two of its three voices move in chromatic half-steps (C to B and G to G#) creating a momentary spike of intensity. This is a delightfully ambiguous touch because it leaves it up to us listeners to decide whether the protagonist's tension is one of approach/avoidance or more simply the joy of confident anticipation.

The vocal parts also help to bring the dramatic structure of the music into relief. Paul sings the first eight measures solo and is joined by John for the remainder of the verse in a bit of two part harmony that is most unusual and tangy. In the counterpoint transcribed below, note the number of open fourths and fifths, some of which follow in parallel (measure 11), and the large number of G naturals in either voice which make for "class 1" cross-relations with the G sharps in the E major harmony below:

       m.9                                   E
Paul     |B    C#  D# |E    F#  G | F# E   |      E   E| E  D   |B     G | E

John     |G#   G#  A  |B    B   C#| B  A   | C    C   C| B  G** |F#    G | E

        How could I dance with an-oth-er, whoo, when I saw her stand-ing there


	[** After many listenings, I'm still not 100% certain whether
	    John intends to be singing G or G# in measure 13; it sounds
	    different from one repetition of the phrase to the next.
	    Sometimes, I even suspect he's intentionally shooting for
	    the blue note that lies in between the two, but other times,
	    I worry he was just waffling a bit.]

Paul's octave jump upward in measure 12 is an extraordinary effect, and note how it's motivation is anticipated by the earlier leap downard of almost the same magnitude at the beginning of the second phrase (measure 5, on the words "the way she looked").

The song contains five iterations of this verse section and other than the words, there is very little variation among them. The most significant difference is in the guitar solo section where interestingly, the chord progression is altered in two places; i.e., measure 3 sustains the E chord instead of moving to A, and in measure 12, the A chord from the previous measure is sustained instead of moving to the unusual C chord. I don't think this is random at all; if you try to imagine the solo played over the chord progression from the other verses, you'll find that the two places which were changed here sound somehow stilted or over-emphasized without the underscoring rhythmic emphasis of the words and vocal parts.

A smaller variation worth noting is the way that at the end of the two verses which each precede a bridge section, the bassline in the final measure contains downward scale which nicely leads us straight into the next section.


Bridges - "Well my heart went boom..."

In spite of their drama, the verse sections have an harmonic shape which is closed overall and bound to the home key. The manner in which this bridge section seems to be centered around the IV chord provides both a refreshing change of outlook as well as a platform from which to set up the return to the home key when the next verse comes around.

As with two of its close cousins, "Love Me Do" and "Please Please Me", we have another bridge here with phrases of unequal length here. The section is ten measures long, and my ears scan it into three phrases; i.e., two + two + six:

         heart went   boom    As I
	|A	     |-		  ||
	 IV

	 crossed that room   And I
	|A	     |-		  ||
	 IV

	 held   her   hand   in    mine	--  --       --    --  --
	|A	     |-	          |B	   |-	    |A	     |-	      ||
	 IV		 	   V		     IV

The totally static harmony of the first six measures, and the triple repetition of the same melodic phrase builds a suspenseful sense of expectation which is fulfilled by the elongated continuation of the third phrase.

You're so used to hearing it as written that it's hard to imagine it being any other way, but if you can snap out of that mind-set for just a moment, you'll notice that it would have been more obvious (read: less original and effective) to restrain the bridge to the more standard length of eight measures and simply end on the V chord. What we have instead, creates an almost paradoxical effect -- the decision to resolve the V chord deceptively to IV for two full measures on the way to its "real" destination of I is a delaying tactic which, on the one hand, reduces some of the tension built up to that point of the bridge. However, four other factors create an even stronger cross-current of *increasing* tension at the same time -- the lengthening of the phrase by two measures, the jump to the falsetto high notes with its concommitant crescendo, the gutsy support work from the rhythm section, and Paul's dramatic, syncopated lead-in to the following verse with "Well, we ..."

The key contribution of the vocal parts to the strong impact of this bridge is not to be underestimated. In contrast with the verse, we have John and Paul singing together throughout this bridge, with John employing a favorite device of theirs; sustaining during measures 1 - 6, the single note of 'A' against Paul singing the actual melody part above him. However, the real master stroke of this section is in the use of falsetto within the final four measures. The following is what the composite vocal parts of measure 5 - 10 look like:

  m.5			      B -------------- C#------------
  E|G     F#    |E      E |F#-------|---------|E--------|---- A    G| E
  A|A     A     |A      A |B        |         |         |           |

She held  her    hand   in mine ----------------------------  Well we danced

If you listen very carefully though, you'll discover that the top line is not sung by one person alone, but is the byproduct of John's jumping over Paul by an octave in measure 7. The following blow-by-blow narrative of is perhaps less clear than it would appear to you if I had music paper on which to transcribe it, but this is the best I can do with words alone: Paul actually sustains the F# at the beginning of measure 7 all the way through measure 8, and then moves down to E natural for measures 9 and the beginning of 10, before picking up the melody again for the beginning of the following verse. John, who has been singing just A natural beneath him the whole time moves up in parallel fifths with Paul to B at the beginning of measure 7 and in the second beat of the measure jumps a dizzying octave to the high B, and it is he who sustains that impossible high note all the way through to the C# in measure 9. The ultimate clue for this is that on some of the outtakes, the high C# is sustained long enough that it overlaps with Paul's starting the next verse. Check it out!

Stepping back from the details, it's worth noting how, on a structural level, the use here of both falsetto and an octave jump add unity to the overall composition by their subconscious association with the earlier appearances of both techniques.


Outro - "...since I saw her standing there."

The triple repetition of the final phrase of the last verse is relatively conventional for the genre we're dealing with. The first two repetitions are identical both melodically and harmonically, and are built on a simple I-V-I chord progression.

The final repetition, while melodically the same as the previous two, provides a small harmonic modification; i.e., a IV chord gets interpolated between the V and the final I chord. This is the same trick we saw at the end of the bridge, and its reappearance here helps put the brakes on for the conclusion of the piece, as well as providing yet another subtle touch of unification.

For you harmony freaks who like to keep track of every little Beatles trademark, we also have a classically free-dissonant chord at the very end; E Major with at least F# and possible C# as well tacked on for spice.


What's it all about ?

I've made a habit in these Notes of spending a moment or two at the end in consideration of what hidden meanings might be embedded in the lyrics. But I'll tell you, if you need me to sort *this* one out for you, then you're really in trouble :-).

For a rare change, we have no romantic or emotional complications; no angst, no pangs, not even the slightest amount of self doubt; this time, (to paraphrase Richard Price's "The Wanderers") it's more like some "hip ditty bop noise" reminding us in perpetuity of the "nowness and coolness" of being seventeen and falling in, what you think is, true love, most likely for the first time.

Granted, there is more often than not, an eventually bitter side to this experience, but I believe that the song isn't so much whitewashing over this truth, as much as emphasizing that the sweeter part of it is worth taking with you for the rest of your life.

Surely, you *do* know what I mean ?


Regards,
Alan (awp@bitstream.com *OR* uunet!huxley!awp)

---
"When was the last time you gave a girl a pink-edged daisy ?  When did you
 last embarass a sheila wid your cool appraising stare ?"        051091#26
---

                Copyright (c) 1991 by Alan W. Pollack
                          All Rights Reserved

       This article may be reproduced, retransmitted, redistributed and
       otherwise propagated at will, provided that this notice remains
       intact and in place.

Misery

2
Your rating: None Average: 2 (1 vote)

Cover versions and notes on The Beatles' song "Misery".

Provenance
Written By: 
Lennon/McCartney
Year: 
1963
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Cover Versions
Amazon MP3: 
Alan W. Pollack's "Notes On"

Notes on "Misery" (M1.1)

KEY     C Major

METER   4/4

FORM    Intro -> Verse -> Verse -> Bridge ->
                        Verse -> Bridge -> Verse -> Outro (fadeout)

GENERAL POINTS OF INTEREST


Style and Form

- "Misery" is one of a group of songs from the Please Please Me album sadly fated for obscurity in America, where most people had no familiarity with it until Capitol released the _Early Beatles_ album in spring '65, a full two years after it was recorded. And by that point the drift of popular attention to the group was understandably tilted toward the really new material.

- This obscurity is particularly unfortunate to the extent that the song's overall sound, characterized by a shuffling, "washboard" beat and spare, pseudo-acoustic instrumental texture, represents a genuine if somewhat under-appreciated facet of the group's early style.

- The melody is in short phrases, punctuated by rhythm guitar obbligato figures, and the rhetorical interjections of the song's title in the lyrics.

- The form is the standard two-bridge model with one verse intervening. The relatively short duration of the finished song could have easily accommodated an additional instrumental-solo verse before the second bridge, but my theory is that the closed shape of those verse sections, *especially* built as they are from such a limited set of chords, would have been a claustrophobic mistake that they wisely avoided.

- The lyrics of the four verses form a familiar pattern of ABCC.

- Three of the four verses and the refrains all begin rhythmically on the downbeat. The lone exception is the second verse ("I've lost her now"), which begins with a pickup.


Melody and Harmony

- The first half of the verse tune sports a jumpy pentatonic lick before the other notes of the scale make their appearance in the second half. The bridge tune is based unusually on the step-wise descent of an entire octave.

- Only four chords are used. In order of appearance you have F, G, C, and 'a'; i.e., IV, V, I, and vi, respectively. The vi chord is used in this song as though it were a full-fledged sub-dominant (in the way it sets up the V chord) or even as a surrogate dominant (in the way it sometimes is inserted *between* the I chord on either side). Only at the beginning of the bridge is it used in its more typecast role as the relative minor, or "submediant".


Arrangement

- The voice parts are predominantly sung in unison but there are surprise blossomings into two-part harmony, typically saved for phrase endings.

- Paul uses the same sort of dotted quarter and eighth notes in the bass part that we saw in FMTY. This also cleverly carries forward into the bass line the same snapped rhythm that pervades the main melody of the song, as well as it rescues the bass line from would be otherwise have been a dull, unrelieved four in the bar.

- The piano edit pieces in the intro and bridge are a relatively small touch, but one of no small historic interest; aside from the fracas regarding Andy White's guest drumming stint on the original version of "Love Me Do", this is likely the very first appearance of a guest performer on a Beatles track in order to provide something the Boys could not do for themselves. Granted, it's a far cry from the likes of the string quartets and solo brass instruments that would come later, but it's the same concept nevertheless.

SECTION-BY-SECTION WALKTHROUGH


Intro

- The intro is only four measures long (discounting the opening piano arpeggio), but it has the full essence of the rest of the song embedded within in it:

        "Adagio" -------------->"A Tempo"
        |F      |G      |C      |a     G    
     C:  IV      V       I       vi    V

- Starting off with a dramatically slow intro may have been a fairly common technique among the rest of pop/rock music, but L&M very rarely used it at all. Aside from the contemporaneous "Do You Want To Know A Secret?", I can't even think of another example off the top of my head; something worth keeping an ear out for in the rest of our studies.

- The choice of opening chord progression makes this yet another Beatles song that opens away from the home key, yet quickly converges upon it.

- In the space of just these few measures were are quickly introduced to several devices that ultimately characterize and permeate the rest of the song; e.g., the unison singing which unfolds into harmony, the decorative use of the piano, and the I-vi-V chord progression.

- Mark for later reference the little chromatic move in the bass line during the transition from measure 1 to 2 (F -> F# -> G).


Verse

- The verse is a brief and harmonically static eight measures:

        |C      |F      |C      |F       -      |G      |C      |a       
         I       IV      I       IV              V       I       iv

- Note how the embellishment of the F chord with "neighbor" tones of D-C-D in the guitar part lends a jazzy, added-sixth sound to the accompaniment.

- In spite of the few chords used, a subtle syncopation in the harmonic rhythm is created by sustaining the same chord (i.e., F, the IV) over the two measures that straddle the mid-verse divide between measures 4 & 5.

- As we saw with FMTY, wherever a verse if followed by yet another verse section, the final measure shifts to the vi chord instead of sustaining the I chord all the way through, as happens in verses which are followed by a bridge. I've told you there are formulaic aspects to this sort of composition.


Bridge

- We have another eight-measure section, one that provides the traditional contrast to the preceding verses:

        |a      |-      |C      |-       a      |-      |G      |-       
         vi              I                vi             V

- The harmonic rhythm is slower than the verse, and the steep scale-wise descent in the melody here is in contrast to the jumping here and about seen earlier. Some consistency with the verse is maintained in the way we still have short, declarative phrases in dotted rhythm, punctuated by the accompaniment; here the piano, instead of the guitar, provides the mimicking obbligato.

- The bass line contains two uncanny details that closely unify it with what is going on elsewhere: the lead-in to the bridge begins with the same sort of chromatic lick seen in the intro (G -> G# -> A), and the lead-out of the bridge to the next verse is made up of a descending scale (G - through C), reminiscent of the vocal part.

- The 'a' minor chord in the first measure of this section sounds at first as though it *might* be a part of a modulation to that key but it's really too short-lived to count.

- Unofficial releases of outtakes 1 through 6 of this song are an apt example of both a prime kind of material not included within the scope of the Anthology and candid portrait of them operating under the stress of a series of sloppy mistakes following what otherwise sounds like a pretty clean first take. Take 6 contains typical Ringo drum fills in measures 4 and 8 of the bridges. Though nicely performed and not entirely inappropriate, my guess is that he was asked to eliminate them from the final version in order to keep unbroken the hypnotic mood of the shuffling rhythm.


Outro

- This outro is built from several repeats of the last two measures of the verse into a quick fadeout.

- The vocal parts burst forth in some "oohs" which are more anguished than passionate for a change, as well as some "lah-lahs." These come across as impromptu, though we find in take 1 the virtually the identical set of them as in the final version.

- It is John who takes the lead in these vocal effects, and his move is all the more effective because it is the first time in the entire song that we hear a *solo* voice.

SOME FINAL THOUGHTS

- This is one of the rare, early L&M originals in which the girl is spoken of entirely in the third person. Ironically, it appears back to back on the "Please Please Album" with another one of these rare examples, the very upbeat "I Saw Her Standing There". The uninterrupted flowing beat of "Misery" provides some forward-looking optimism in counterpoint to the otherwise downbeat lyrics. In the context of the album lineup, I believe that this subtle hint in "Misery" of a sun concealed behind the overcast mitigates what might have otherwise been too stark of a manic-depressive contrast between those first two tracks.

Regards,
Alan (awp@world.std.com)


---

"Quite right, invites to gambling dens full of easy money and fast women,
 chicken sandwiches, and cornets of caviar, disgusting!"      030401#29.1

---

Revision History
072991  29.0    Original release
030401  29.1    Add second-pass observations and copy edit




                Copyright (c) 1991, 2001 by Alan W. Pollack
                          All Rights Reserved
This article may be reproduced, retransmitted, redistributed and otherwise propagated at will, provided that this notice remains intact and in place.

Anna (Go to Him)

3
Your rating: None Average: 3 (1 vote)

Cover versions of the song "Anna (Go to Him)", which also was covered by The Beatles.

Provenance
Year: 
1963
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
John Lennon
Cover Versions

Chains

2
Your rating: None Average: 2 (1 vote)
Provenance
Year: 
1962
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
George Harrison
Cover Versions
Amazon MP3: 

Boys

3
Your rating: None Average: 3 (1 vote)
Provenance
Year: 
1960
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
Ringo Starr
Cover Versions

Ask Me Why

1
Your rating: None Average: 1 (1 vote)

Cover versions and notes on The Beatles' song "Ask Me Why".

Provenance
Written By: 
Lennon/McCartney
Year: 
1962
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
John Lennon
Cover Versions
Alan W. Pollack's "Notes On"

Notes on "Love Me Do" (LMD)

To those who would argue that the early original songs of The Beatles are just the same old stuff of which the Top 40 was made in the early 60s, I draw your attention to this first official release of theirs; in fact, it was exactly 29 years ago **today (I couldn't help notice that in 1962, the 5th of October fell out on a Friday just as it does this year -- such slavish synchrony!)

Granted, by itself, "Love Me Do" (LMD) is hardly the blockbuster of which legendary careers are made. In contrast, those silly lists of "The 500 Most Golden Oldies of All Time" promoted by certain radio stations are peppered through with songs by groups whose claim to fame rests on the strength of just one single; I expect general agreement from you all that LMD wouldn't have done that for our Boys.

In fact, it's tempting at first blush to dismiss this one as too simple and even unappealing. After all, we have what must be very nearly the skimpiest Lennon/McCartney lyric ever, a gawky post-skiffle beat which threatens to break into a polka in a couple of places, and a vocal duet that would appear to be ripped off from the Everly Brothers. But just beneath the surface, you find not only that certain bristling intensity in their voices, but also a great deal of idiosyncratic originality in the compositional details. One might even call it stylistically prophetic, especially in regards to the phrasing, the vocal harmonies, and the modal melody.

The most intruiging aspect to this intuitive innovation of the early Beatles is the question of how much of it was motivated by intentional originality and how much a by-product of less-than-entirely-adept emulation of their derivative influences. It's a quite serious question, the answer to which, in spite of the seeming pejorative value judgment in my choice of words, has nothing to do with the relative merit of the final product itself; but I leave this question for now in the hands of the aestheticians.


Form

The form of this song is fairly typical:

    Intro-> Verse -> Verse -> Bridge -> Verse ->
	Bridge (solo) -> Verse-> Outro

Of interest is the positioning of the instrumental solo within a repeat of the bridge rather than a verse section. It's because of this that there is only one verse separating the two bridges; more typical of the period (e.g., "I Saw Her Standing There", or even "How Do You Do It") is to double up on the verses in the middle, one of which, in that case, usually contains an instrumental solo.


Harmony and Modality

I've pointed out in connection with several of John's middle-period songs a penchant for harmonic frugality. This song with only three chords is certainly a good early example; these are, in order of appearance are the very basic ones of G, C, and D (I, IV, and V). As we'll see below, in a deft move, the last of them, D, is held back until as late as the bridge section.

LMD is ostensibly in the key of G Major though it contains a strong Mixolydian modal inflection from the heavy use of both F-naturals in the tune and in its reliance on the I-IV-I to establish a feeling of tonal center. The non-modal Major V chord with an F# is used only in the bridge.

Another different sort of modal inflection in this song comes from the liberal melodic use of bluesy bent-notes on b-flat over the G major chord (with its b-naturals) in the accompaniment.

Intro

The intro is a balanced eight measure phrase and utilizes just the two chords of G and C.

We're treated right at the outset to another soon-to-become signature device of John's: the slow triplet rhythm, as it is found here in the harmonica part, measure 3. Furthermore, we find in this harmonica solo a very early example of the use of a hook-phrase used throughout an entire song: the little descending motif of "f-e-d-g", with it's bluesy emphasis on the seventh note of the scale (f) and the heavy use of flutter-tongueing on the repeats, so suggestive of a sob or a cry. There's also the melodic emphasis in this little riff on the note "d." as it appears superimposed of the C chord, lending an overall jazzy C9 flavor the song.

As we soon see, this introductory hook is made ubiquitous in the song by the incorporation of this intro within the final portion of the verse section; or shall I say that the final part of the verse is set-up as the hook by virtue of its having already appeared in the intro ? Just a matter of semantics, I suppose.

Verse

The verse is an unusual thirteen measures long and is broken into the sub-phrases which pretty much follow the scanning of the lyrics:

	(3 times 2) 	Love, love me 		|do.		You
			know I love 		|you.		I'll
			always be 		|true		So

	(3 		ple -   - 	|-e -  -  - | -ase       love me
	    plus 4)	do.  (return of the hook)

This sort of free meter in the scanning of the words (no iambic pentameter for These Boys) is a noteworthy, not infrequent feature of their later songs, especially those written by John. Its appearance here in such an early, and otherwise not so ambitious, piece of work is astonishing.

The music continues on with just the same two chords from the intro. Note how the break of the regular harmonic rhythm in measures 7 - 9 (on the elongation of the word "please") enhances the impact of the irregular phrasing:

	 ------ 3X -----			  ----- 2X -----
	|G	|C	||C	|-	|-	||G	|C	|
G:	 I	 IV

The vocal harmony of this verse contains two specific seminal details which would soon become telltale characteristics of "that Beatles sound"; one being the use of open fifths instead of the more typical thirds or sixths, as in the phrase "Love, love me do":

			     G
			   F
			 /
	Paul:	D	D

			   D
                         /   C
	John:	G	G

Note in the above example the special coloration, a melding of the two voices, that arises from this sort of harmony. I'm fairly certain that it's John on the bottom (though there's that famous interview clip with Paul discussing the infamous acetate of "That'll Be the Day" in which he sings the bottom part of this same fragment), though with Paul in a busking partial falsetto on the top they're hard to distinguish from each other.

The other vocal detail is the sustaining of the same note in the upper part against the scale-wise movement in the lower, as on the drawing out of the word "please"; Paul's bending of the note so reminiscent of the harmonica part:

	Paul:	G	G   G   G

	John:	E	D   C	E

One final point of interest here is in the careful working out of the arrangement no matter how spare and simple it is. Note the unity amidst varation that is achieved by following the harmonica solo of the intro with a verse that first features a vocal duet and then concludes with solo voice and the opening harmonica hook figure as backing.

And a detail within a detail: note how at the end of the verse when Paul sings "love me do" solo, he's actually jumping the octave down from his earlier part to the range where John was singing in the duet. According to the interview with Paul in Lewisohn's preface, this was an artifact of a last minute change in the studio to the arrangement; John was supposed to sing it but it was impossible for him to get the harp in his mouth quickly enough to also play the hook on time. Regardless of the motivation, it's a nice serendiptitious touch.

Bridge

The third of the three chords used in this song finally makes its appearance in the bridge section as part of the bluesy V-IV-I progression. It's all rather dramatic in that, not only haven't we seen this V chord ('D.') yet, but we haven't seen the pitch f# at all in the melody either; the verse staying exlusively with those bluesy/modal f naturals. Of course, just to keep the game interesting, the vocal melody in this bridge alternates continually between the f# and f natural.

The first appearance of the bridge is eight measures long, and features the only new words to be found in the song outside of the first verse. In contrast to the verse, the phrasing of 4 + 4 is quite square, almost too much so; at a distance of almost thirty years, I still find the "bim BOM" rhythm on beats 2&3 of the eighth measure disconcertingly teetering toward the lame:

	-------------- 2X --------------
	|D	|-	|C	|G	|
G:	 V		 IV	 I

The arrangement of this bridge is just as careful as that of the verse. Here we have Paul singing solo while doubled by the harmonic alternating with Paul and John singing in octaves. Note how, just as in the verse, Paul makes another octave jump (upward this time) between his solo and duet parts; just coincidence or true choreography ?

The second appearance of the bridge is an instrumental section of twelve measures, the first eight of which are an adaptation of the previous bridge with John playing a harmonica part in place of Paul's vocal.

Tacked onto this first phrase are four additional measures of harmonica riffing over mostly just the G chord with an oom-pah bassline. In a manner analogous to the ending of the first bridge, this four measure extension concludes with another (dare I say) even more lame "Booomp" on the third beat of the last measure; the solo note of D in the bass, punctuated by a crash of the cymbal here serves in place of the V chord which begs for the next verse.

Outro

The outro, in typical fashion provides a final reinforcement of the hook phrase, with its repetition of the intro/end-of-verse section ad infinitum into the fade-out.


An Overflow of Comparisons

We've come to the end of the song but not yet the end of this article. I've got three sorts of brief comparative analyses up my sleeve for a grande finale.

- LMD versus "How Do You Do It":

Just how does our current offering stack up against the Mitch Murray cover that George Martin would've had them perform for their first single instead ? Some interesting contrasts:

  • Both songs are in the same key of G and have almost identical forms.
  • HDYDI uses "more" chords though nothing more exotic than the so-called Brill Building selection; in addition to I-IV-V, there's vi, ii, and and V-of-V. Compared to the raunchy modality of LMD, it's quite diatonically Major sounding.
  • HDYDI does have a catchy touch of syncopation in its hook phrase, but note how the phrasing is unrelievedly four-square throughout.
  • HDYDI positions its instrumental solo in a more traditional verse section, and furthermore features solo guitar in place of harmonica.
  • You have some of the same sorts of duet/solo alternation in the arrangement of both songs, though HDYDI features straight-line parallel thirds.
  • Though less countrified than LMD, HDYDI is still closer to pop than hard rock or blues.

Point-for-point, HDYDI clearly wins out as a less risky, more "conservative" choice in terms which may explain both the lackluster albeit well-mannered performance given it by the Boys as well as their ultimate rejection of it by them. Besides, they hadn't written this one anyway; "aaaaah, give it to Gerry."

- LMD versus the other L/M originals on the "Please Please Me Album":

Again, there are some interesting point-for-point contrasts. No surprise, but some of the same signature devices of the nascent Beatles sound that we found in LMD are also found in these other songs:

Similarly no suprise, but these other songs have several telltale Beatles signatures *not* to be found in LMD:

LMD, this time quite surprisingly, is unique overall, though, in the modal inflection of its harmony. By the way, you might note how, in spite of their well known R&B background both as Quarrymen and as Beatles at the Beeb, this early set of eight originals overall is rather more pop-than-rock oriented, in spite of the promise of, say, ISHST and PPM.

- the two versions of LMD compared:

Alot has been made of the fact that the official version released on the PPM album contains a studio drummer (one Andy White) with the unfortunate Ringo relegated to the lowly position of hitting the tambourine on the offbeats.

I'd venture to say that as a commercial recording, the Andy White version is the one performed with greater polish and confidence, and recorded with better presence and clarity. Yet, for a unique early snapshot of the Boys at work, the Ringo-drumming version (thankfully now generally available on Past Masters, I) is definitely the one to be preferred because of power with which it speaks to both your ears and heart.

With your ears, you can more easily hear the handclaps in the bridge of this version, though without the tambourine, the overall texture sounds a tad thin. More importantly, from the quiver in his voice, you can tell just how nervous Paul is at this first "for real" recording session; the dotted notes in his bass line sounding tentative and uncertain; the same for Ringo's drumming.

But best and most precious of all is what your heart responds to in this version of the song, if only you'll open it widely enough. There's a lot of "self" invested in those long, drawn-out phrases; you can keenly feel them putting their "all" on the line. And if you've ever been so lucky in life, it ought to resonate in you with some past experience of your own.

Let's say, a situation in which your words weren't all you wanted to say, but you were brave enough anyway to commit it to print and give it to the world ? Where you knew, in your heart, that someday all your hopes and wishes would come true, even if everyone told you "a guitar's all right, but you'll never earn a living by it"--- or words to that effect ? Where you had to prove it to yourself, somehow, some way, somewhere that you could make the future really *happen* for yourself?

That's what LMD meant to our own sweet Boys. It may not have been the best song they ever wrote, but it was the Prime Step for them; it was their first shot at immortality. And such a humble offering...but what a seed of passion contained therein, don't you think ?

Regards,
Alan (awp@bitstream.com *OR* uunet!huxley!awp)

---
"They tried to fob you off on this musical charlatan, but *I* gave him the test." **100590#21
--- ** posted two days early since ** I'll be briefly away from ** the net on 10/5.

Copyright (c) 1990 by Alan W. Pollack All Rights Reserved This article may be reproduced, retransmitted, redistributed and otherwise propagated at will, provided that this notice remains intact and in place.

Please Please Me

5
Your rating: None Average: 5 (1 vote)

Cover versions and notes on The Beatles' song "Please Please Me".

Provenance
Written By: 
Lennon/McCartney
Year: 
1962
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
John Lennon
Cover Versions
Alan W. Pollack's "Notes On"

Notes on "Please Please Me" (PPM)

"Please Please Me" (PPM) is only their second single, but it already represents a quantum leap in compositional terms for the Beatles over their first one, "Love Me Do" (LMD). In addition to the tight vocal harmonies seen earlier, we have here a couple of tricky chord choices, crackling drum fills, continuous variation in the deployment of the backing vocals, and as they say in the 'biz', much, much more.

Compared with the extant tapes of the Quarrymen, the Star Club, the Decca audition, or even the couple of preceding EMI sessions, PPM gives us an energized performance and an arrangement more complicated than anything these Boys had attempted heretofore. This would seem to suggest that the firm and creative influence of George Martin began to be felt even at this early date.

This song is also emotionally quite gripping, not only because of its apparently incessant drive, but even more so for the very human way in which the hero appears to waver in the amount of self-control he can muster -- starting out urgingly insistent yet trying to appear controlled; talking through clenched teeth in a forced-polite voice, even while his facade is continually cracking to reveal the true heat and impatience behind it. On one level, it's a fairly obvious seduction scenario, yet you find yourself quite hypnotized if not overwhelmed by the force and subtlety with which the meaning of the words are played-off against the message of the music.


Stating Point of View

The lyrics of PPM, when compared with the other contemporaneous songs of Lennon and McCartney, seem rather unique in terms of point of view and expositional context. The cannonical bundle of their original songs which were officially released up through the end of '63 (i.e., the 21 single and album cuts running from LMD through "Not a Second Time") makes for an interesting study from this perspective; a thorough job is way out of scope with this current article but even the bare statistics are revealing:

- All 21 songs are about the romantic relationship between a boy and a girl from the perspective of the boy; granted, so far no surprise.

- 17 of the songs are written in direct address to the girl, and these range from the vulnerable pleading of LMD to the mushy puppy love of "Do You Want to Know a Secret", to the glib giddiness of "I Wanna Be Your Man." The harsher confrontations which would suddenly become a staple trademark starting on the "A Hard Day's Night" album with such classics as "Tell Me Why" and "You Can't Do That" are represented in this sampling only by the relatively milder "Not a Second Time".

- Only 2 of the songs are soliloquies in which the girl is spoken of in the third person; you have the encomium of "I Saw Her Standing There" versus the angst-ridden confessional of "Misery".

- Two of the songs stick out as unique; "She Loves You", which features core-talk advice from the singer to his friend regarding the *friend's* girl, and our current choice, PPM.

In PPM, we have what is in essence a direct address, but one that is framed as kiss-and-tell reportage of something that happened The Night Before; as though most of the lyrics should be written in quotes. Of course, it's a small, even moot, distinction because your ultimate experience of the song is on the level of overhearing the boy urging the girl directly and in real time; like a so-called frame-tale short story in which by the second page you've totally forgotten that there ever was any frame established at the beginning because the action itself is so absorbing.


Form

PPM has a compact form of which is likely motivated by the length of the verses and the general raving intensity of mood which would begin to chafe if unduly prolonged. Note the solitary bridge section and the absence of an instrumental solo break:

        Intro-> Verse -> Verse -> Bridge -> Verse -> Outro

The use of a complete ending is worthy of note. In context of the rest of the top 40 of this period, circa 1963, where, failing recourse to a statistical analysis of the matter, we seem to at least remember everything as having a fade out at the end, the relatively large number of early Lennon and McCartney songs with complete endings (12 out of those same cannonical 21 singled out above) would seem to be bucking a trend; then again, perhaps "setting a trend" would be more correct under the circumstances; after all, for a while, it *was* their profession.

Harmony and Modality

Compared to the tangy modality of LMD, the melodic material here is purely diatonic E Major. The harmony, in contrast, while still heavily reliant on I-IV-V, presents us with some unusual surprises in the form of the G and C chords which add just a hint of bluesy minor-mode inflection.

Intro

The introductory phrase of only four measures played over the unchanging E Major (I) chord is deceptively simple. Here, as we've seen in so many other songs, the intro, for all its brevity, plays a key expository role.

First off, we have the ever popular hook phrase trumpeted out by the harmonica and guitar in unison. In many songs, such hook phrases foreshadow material that will appear in either the melody of the coming verses or as a mockingbird-like obligatto figure in the background. In PPM the hook is used both ways.

Secondly, we have the unusual pick-up start on the fourth beat. What you'll look back on later as the unrelenting forward drive of this song is thus to be found here right at the very start in the iambic "da-DUM" gesture of those first two notes; even that little drum fill which bridges the gap between the end of the intro and the beginning of the verse reinforces this gesture.

Lastly, take note for now of that pleasant dotted quarter note snap in the second measure of our hook phrase; the better to appreciate how this phrase is modified for its appearance in the melody of the verse.

First Verse - "Last night I said these words to my girl"

The verse is sixteen measures long and is built out of four phrases of even length:

        1
        |E              |-              |A      E       |  G  GA  AB BB |
E:       I                               IV     I         III  IV  V

        5
        |E              |-              |A      E       |-              |
         I                               IV     I

        9
        |A              |f#             |c#             |A              |
         IV              ii              vi              IV

       13
        |E              |A      B       |E              |A      B       |
         I               IV     V        I               IV     V

As you work your way through the four phrases in turn, you quickly discover a clever overall dramatic shape to the verse. The first two phrases hang together like a couplet, and the remaining two phrases seem to meld into a refrain-like eight-measure unit.

The first two phrases are obviously related to each other, though there is a subtlety in the transition between the two of them which is the first clue to our hero's wavering self-control. The last measure of the first phrase, on the one hand, seems to suggest a sudden extra push forward with its syncopated, momentary speed-up of the harmonic rhythm; note the three Major chords moving step-wise in a row and changing on the offbeat, the first of which - G Major - isn't even a legitimate member of the key we're in, adding a bluesy cross relation to the texture - g natural against a background of g sharps. For an instant, we seem to be hurtling just a tad out of control. And yet, with the start of the second phrase, we're right back where we started out before. Order has been restored; as though our hero, carried away by his own sweet excitement quickly catches himself and backs off, the better to resume his former polite and measured, albeit insistent, tack.

Although the second phrase is virtually identical to the first, the difference between them in their final measures is of structural significance. The open ending of the first one on V smoothly motivates the start of the second one. By contrast, the closed harmonic ending of the second phrase on the I chord includes that unusual guitar riff in measure eight, the combination of which sets off this opening couplet from what follows.

The third phrase is one of both musical excursis and build toward a climax by virtue of the introduction of new chords, the progression away from the I yet not necessarily reaching a clear resting point, and of course, the employment in every measure of the hard syncopation on the half-beat between 2 and 3; this last peturbation being ironic to the extent that this very phrase is the only one in the entire song in which the harmonic rhythm holds steady for as long as four measures. The climax, per se, is to be found in the reaching of the melodic apex (high A) of the entire verse in measure 12.

You would surmise at this point that our hero has crosssed the start-line and opened his attack for better or worse, but immediately following, we experience yet another retreat of sorts in the way the fourth phrase resolves the accumlated tension of the preceding one with its return to a musical texture and vocabulary that is very close to that of the first two phrases: no more syncopations, a resumption of plain I-IV-V, and an exchange of the "come Ons" for the "please pleases"; all this, reinforced by the return of the hook phrase at the very end. Incidentally, note how the placement of the hook above the I-IV-V progression in this context gives it a different feel from the one it has when it is accompanied by just the I chord as in the intro or the first half of the verse.

Details, Duckie

All this agitation and the thrashing between polite insistence and a less patient coaxing is only further enhanced by the manifest details of the verse's arrangement.

The adaptation of the opening hook phrase as it appears in the melody of the first two phrases conveys determined insistence on at least two levels. First off, in the second measure, the snapped rhythm heard in the intro is here replaced by a continuation of the "marcato", almost hammer-like quarter notes of the first measure. Enhancing this is the way that Paul sustains the single tone of E *above* John's singing of the actual melody. Quite nicely, the snapped rhythm isn't entirely dispensed with here, but is rather moved all the way to the extended ending of the hook phrase in measure three, where it too adds to the mood of insistence.

The forward-propelling syncopations of the third phrase are put into bold italics by the antiphional deployment of the backing voices of Paul and George; soon to become yet another Beatles signature device. Unusual here is the way in which the fragments sung by the lead and the backers fit seamlessly together in one melodic line; an effect of great antiquity in classical music, the technical term for which is "hocket."

Gentler though undeniable pushes forward are to be found as well in the drum fills which bridge measures 4/5, 7/8, and the springing guitar riff of measure 8 itself.

And on the side of vacillation, the harmonic rhythm over the course of these sixteen measure is more varied, changeable, and uneven than virtually any other example we've looked at in this series thus far.

Second Verse - "You don't need me to show the way love"

Aside from some new lyrics, the entire verse is repeated virtually verbatim with one minor change made at the end to smoothly effect the transition into the bridge. In the last measure here, the harmony holds still on I, the hook phrase is truncated by half, and for a single instant (the only one of its kind in the entire song), all voices and guitars are tacet in favor of a series of solo drum fills. It's a subtle gesture which binds off what has preceded and, at the same time, leads ahead to what follows.

Bridge - "I don't want to start complaining"

Even though this bridge is built out of the same old three basic chords, the lyrics of the song take a decided turn at this point for the openly confrontational in this section, and the music, too, provides plenty of contrast with what has preceded.

First off, there is the unusual ten measure length which is broken up into two phrases of uneven length:

        |A      |B      |E      |-      |
         IV      V       I

        |A      |B      |E      |A   B  |E      |A   B  |
         IV      V       I       IV  V   I       IV  V

Note how both phrases start out away from the tonic and quickly close in on it. The first phrase here is distinguished by its novel use of the backing voices; at first, just harmonized "ahhhs" behind John's solo, followed by the surprising "in my heart" rejoinder of measure 4.

The second phrase is even more interesting. Paradoxically, though its length is stretched out, the harmonic rhythm is conversely quickened in its second half, and this serves to draw us back into the final verse with the same music that was used earlier to lead the first verse into the second one, fanfare-like hook phrase and all.

What is perhaps the most climactic moment of the entire song takes place in the third measure of this second bridge phrase; where the melody suddenly jumps an octave to high B (no coincidence, the single highest melodic peak in the song) on the phrase "to reason with YOU." Ironically, the chords to the beginning of both bridge phrases are identical, yet, the E chord, which in the first phrase provides a focal point of repose, here in the second phrase, by virtue of the melodic high-point, serves as a jumping off point for the rest of the phrase with its open ending on V; context is all.

The musical climax of this section is in direct synchrony with that of the lyrics, yet, with the transition right into the final verse, we back off yet again from what otherwise might have seemed a point of no return.

Last Verse and Outro

The final verse is a full reprise of the first one, and the familiar device of ending with a triple repeat of the last sub-phrase is neatly worked in here as a natural outgrowth of the fourth phrase of the verse.

Although none of the thematic material in this outro is anything new by this point of the song, the boys do bring out a couple of surprises they've clearly been saving till the end. The first one is the pseudo-contrapuntal texture in which the "please please me" and hook phrases seem to swirl and cascade around us. But most attention grabbing of all is choice of chords for the final phrase, each one of which is sharply punctuated by a fill of four even sixteenth notes on the snare drum:

                |E      G       |C      B       |E      |
                 I     V of VI   VI     V        I
                      |               |
                       from parallel
                         minor

The use of the G and C chords is not nearly so far out as might seem at first sight; especially if you think of them in context of being borrowed, as it were, from the parallel minor key; besides, we were even sort of "warned" to half-expect something like this given the early appearance of the G chord by itself in the verse; kind of like how the murder weapon in a mystery appears as a casual prop in the first scene. Still, the bluesy hint of the minor mode plus the implicit cross-relations of the G and C naturals against predominant sharps of the E Major key makes an extremely bracing effect. For laughs, try this last phrase with the more "correct" diatonic chords of G# Major and c# minor and see how hopelessly square it sounds by contrast.

In the final result, this song is a worthy textbook example of where a fade out ending would be, not just wishy-washy, but suggestive of a different unravelling of our hero's outing; one filled with intimations of endless begging. Instead, the audacious ending we are given provides the quite appropriate denoument for the passionate plot of the song up to this point. It is as though our hero, careful not to shoot his whole wad too soon lest all else fails, has held back something, (not without some difficulty, I dare say), with which to bring things ultimately to a head with an abrupt, pro-active bang, so to speak; hence, the full ending from which, this time, there can be no retreat.

Regards,
Alan (awp@bitstream.com *OR* uunet!huxley!awp)

---
"They tried to fob you off on this musical charlatan, but *I* gave him the test." 110790#22
---

Copyright (c) 1990 by Alan W. Pollack All Rights Reserved This article may be reproduced, retransmitted, redistributed and otherwise propagated at will, provided that this notice remains intact and in place.

Love Me Do

2
Your rating: None Average: 2 (1 vote)

Cover versions and notes on The Beatles' song "Love Me Do".

Provenance
Written By: 
Lennon/McCartney
Year: 
1962
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
Paul McCartney
Cover Versions
Alan W. Pollack's "Notes On"

Notes on "Love Me Do" (LMD)

To those who would argue that the early original songs of The Beatles are just the same old stuff of which the Top 40 was made in the early 60s, I draw your attention to this first official release of theirs; in fact, it was exactly 29 years ago **today (I couldn't help notice that in 1962, the 5th of October fell out on a Friday just as it does this year -- such slavish synchrony!)

Granted, by itself, "Love Me Do" (LMD) is hardly the blockbuster of which legendary careers are made. In contrast, those silly lists of "The 500 Most Golden Oldies of All Time" promoted by certain radio stations are peppered through with songs by groups whose claim to fame rests on the strength of just one single; I expect general agreement from you all that LMD wouldn't have done that for our Boys.

In fact, it's tempting at first blush to dismiss this one as too simple and even unappealing. After all, we have what must be very nearly the skimpiest Lennon/McCartney lyric ever, a gawky post-skiffle beat which threatens to break into a polka in a couple of places, and a vocal duet that would appear to be ripped off from the Everly Brothers. But just beneath the surface, you find not only that certain bristling intensity in their voices, but also a great deal of idiosyncratic originality in the compositional details. One might even call it stylistically prophetic, especially in regards to the phrasing, the vocal harmonies, and the modal melody.

The most intruiging aspect to this intuitive innovation of the early Beatles is the question of how much of it was motivated by intentional originality and how much a by-product of less-than-entirely-adept emulation of their derivative influences. It's a quite serious question, the answer to which, in spite of the seeming pejorative value judgment in my choice of words, has nothing to do with the relative merit of the final product itself; but I leave this question for now in the hands of the aestheticians.


Form

The form of this song is fairly typical:

    Intro-> Verse -> Verse -> Bridge -> Verse ->
	Bridge (solo) -> Verse-> Outro

Of interest is the positioning of the instrumental solo within a repeat of the bridge rather than a verse section. It's because of this that there is only one verse separating the two bridges; more typical of the period (e.g., "I Saw Her Standing There", or even "How Do You Do It") is to double up on the verses in the middle, one of which, in that case, usually contains an instrumental solo.


Harmony and Modality

I've pointed out in connection with several of John's middle-period songs a penchant for harmonic frugality. This song with only three chords is certainly a good early example; these are, in order of appearance are the very basic ones of G, C, and D (I, IV, and V). As we'll see below, in a deft move, the last of them, D, is held back until as late as the bridge section.

LMD is ostensibly in the key of G Major though it contains a strong Mixolydian modal inflection from the heavy use of both F-naturals in the tune and in its reliance on the I-IV-I to establish a feeling of tonal center. The non-modal Major V chord with an F# is used only in the bridge.

Another different sort of modal inflection in this song comes from the liberal melodic use of bluesy bent-notes on b-flat over the G major chord (with its b-naturals) in the accompaniment.

Intro

The intro is a balanced eight measure phrase and utilizes just the two chords of G and C.

We're treated right at the outset to another soon-to-become signature device of John's: the slow triplet rhythm, as it is found here in the harmonica part, measure 3. Furthermore, we find in this harmonica solo a very early example of the use of a hook-phrase used throughout an entire song: the little descending motif of "f-e-d-g", with it's bluesy emphasis on the seventh note of the scale (f) and the heavy use of flutter-tongueing on the repeats, so suggestive of a sob or a cry. There's also the melodic emphasis in this little riff on the note "d." as it appears superimposed of the C chord, lending an overall jazzy C9 flavor the song.

As we soon see, this introductory hook is made ubiquitous in the song by the incorporation of this intro within the final portion of the verse section; or shall I say that the final part of the verse is set-up as the hook by virtue of its having already appeared in the intro ? Just a matter of semantics, I suppose.

Verse

The verse is an unusual thirteen measures long and is broken into the sub-phrases which pretty much follow the scanning of the lyrics:

	(3 times 2) 	Love, love me 		|do.		You
			know I love 		|you.		I'll
			always be 		|true		So

	(3 		ple -   - 	|-e -  -  - | -ase       love me
	    plus 4)	do.  (return of the hook)

This sort of free meter in the scanning of the words (no iambic pentameter for These Boys) is a noteworthy, not infrequent feature of their later songs, especially those written by John. Its appearance here in such an early, and otherwise not so ambitious, piece of work is astonishing.

The music continues on with just the same two chords from the intro. Note how the break of the regular harmonic rhythm in measures 7 - 9 (on the elongation of the word "please") enhances the impact of the irregular phrasing:

	 ------ 3X -----			  ----- 2X -----
	|G	|C	||C	|-	|-	||G	|C	|
G:	 I	 IV

The vocal harmony of this verse contains two specific seminal details which would soon become telltale characteristics of "that Beatles sound"; one being the use of open fifths instead of the more typical thirds or sixths, as in the phrase "Love, love me do":

			     G
			   F
			 /
	Paul:	D	D

			   D
                         /   C
	John:	G	G

Note in the above example the special coloration, a melding of the two voices, that arises from this sort of harmony. I'm fairly certain that it's John on the bottom (though there's that famous interview clip with Paul discussing the infamous acetate of "That'll Be the Day" in which he sings the bottom part of this same fragment), though with Paul in a busking partial falsetto on the top they're hard to distinguish from each other.

The other vocal detail is the sustaining of the same note in the upper part against the scale-wise movement in the lower, as on the drawing out of the word "please"; Paul's bending of the note so reminiscent of the harmonica part:

	Paul:	G	G   G   G

	John:	E	D   C	E

One final point of interest here is in the careful working out of the arrangement no matter how spare and simple it is. Note the unity amidst varation that is achieved by following the harmonica solo of the intro with a verse that first features a vocal duet and then concludes with solo voice and the opening harmonica hook figure as backing.

And a detail within a detail: note how at the end of the verse when Paul sings "love me do" solo, he's actually jumping the octave down from his earlier part to the range where John was singing in the duet. According to the interview with Paul in Lewisohn's preface, this was an artifact of a last minute change in the studio to the arrangement; John was supposed to sing it but it was impossible for him to get the harp in his mouth quickly enough to also play the hook on time. Regardless of the motivation, it's a nice serendiptitious touch.

Bridge

The third of the three chords used in this song finally makes its appearance in the bridge section as part of the bluesy V-IV-I progression. It's all rather dramatic in that, not only haven't we seen this V chord ('D.') yet, but we haven't seen the pitch f# at all in the melody either; the verse staying exlusively with those bluesy/modal f naturals. Of course, just to keep the game interesting, the vocal melody in this bridge alternates continually between the f# and f natural.

The first appearance of the bridge is eight measures long, and features the only new words to be found in the song outside of the first verse. In contrast to the verse, the phrasing of 4 + 4 is quite square, almost too much so; at a distance of almost thirty years, I still find the "bim BOM" rhythm on beats 2&3 of the eighth measure disconcertingly teetering toward the lame:

	-------------- 2X --------------
	|D	|-	|C	|G	|
G:	 V		 IV	 I

The arrangement of this bridge is just as careful as that of the verse. Here we have Paul singing solo while doubled by the harmonic alternating with Paul and John singing in octaves. Note how, just as in the verse, Paul makes another octave jump (upward this time) between his solo and duet parts; just coincidence or true choreography ?

The second appearance of the bridge is an instrumental section of twelve measures, the first eight of which are an adaptation of the previous bridge with John playing a harmonica part in place of Paul's vocal.

Tacked onto this first phrase are four additional measures of harmonica riffing over mostly just the G chord with an oom-pah bassline. In a manner analogous to the ending of the first bridge, this four measure extension concludes with another (dare I say) even more lame "Booomp" on the third beat of the last measure; the solo note of D in the bass, punctuated by a crash of the cymbal here serves in place of the V chord which begs for the next verse.

Outro

The outro, in typical fashion provides a final reinforcement of the hook phrase, with its repetition of the intro/end-of-verse section ad infinitum into the fade-out.


An Overflow of Comparisons

We've come to the end of the song but not yet the end of this article. I've got three sorts of brief comparative analyses up my sleeve for a grande finale.

- LMD versus "How Do You Do It":

Just how does our current offering stack up against the Mitch Murray cover that George Martin would've had them perform for their first single instead ? Some interesting contrasts: 

  • Both songs are in the same key of G and have almost identical forms.
  • HDYDI uses "more" chords though nothing more exotic than the so-called Brill Building selection; in addition to I-IV-V, there's vi, ii, and and V-of-V. Compared to the raunchy modality of LMD, it's quite diatonically Major sounding.
  • HDYDI does have a catchy touch of syncopation in its hook phrase, but note how the phrasing is unrelievedly four-square throughout.
  • HDYDI positions its instrumental solo in a more traditional verse section, and furthermore features solo guitar in place of harmonica.
  • You have some of the same sorts of duet/solo alternation in the arrangement of both songs, though HDYDI features straight-line parallel thirds.
  • Though less countrified than LMD, HDYDI is still closer to pop than hard rock or blues.

Point-for-point, HDYDI clearly wins out as a less risky, more "conservative" choice in terms which may explain both the lackluster albeit well-mannered performance given it by the Boys as well as their ultimate rejection of it by them. Besides, they hadn't written this one anyway; "aaaaah, give it to Gerry."

- LMD versus the other L/M originals on the "Please Please Me Album":

Again, there are some interesting point-for-point contrasts. No surprise, but some of the same signature devices of the nascent Beatles sound that we found in LMD are also found in these other songs: 

Similarly no suprise, but these other songs have several telltale Beatles signatures *not* to be found in LMD:

LMD, this time quite surprisingly, is unique overall, though, in the modal inflection of its harmony. By the way, you might note how, in spite of their well known R&B background both as Quarrymen and as Beatles at the Beeb, this early set of eight originals overall is rather more pop-than-rock oriented, in spite of the promise of, say, ISHST and PPM.

- the two versions of LMD compared:

A lot has been made of the fact that the official version released on the PPM album contains a studio drummer (one Andy White) with the unfortunate Ringo relegated to the lowly position of hitting the tambourine on the offbeats.

I'd venture to say that as a commercial recording, the Andy White version is the one performed with greater polish and confidence, and recorded with better presence and clarity. Yet, for a unique early snapshot of the Boys at work, the Ringo-drumming version (thankfully now generally available on Past Masters, I) is definitely the one to be preferred because of power with which it speaks to both your ears and heart.

With your ears, you can more easily hear the handclaps in the bridge of this version, though without the tambourine, the overall texture sounds a tad thin. More importantly, from the quiver in his voice, you can tell just how nervous Paul is at this first "for real" recording session; the dotted notes in his bass line sounding tentative and uncertain; the same for Ringo's drumming.

But best and most precious of all is what your heart responds to in this version of the song, if only you'll open it widely enough. There's a lot of "self" invested in those long, drawn-out phrases; you can keenly feel them putting their "all" on the line. And if you've ever been so lucky in life, it ought to resonate in you with some past experience of your own.

Let's say, a situation in which your words weren't all you wanted to say, but you were brave enough anyway to commit it to print and give it to the world? Where you knew, in your heart, that someday all your hopes and wishes would come true, even if everyone told you "a guitar's all right, but you'll never earn a living by it"--- or words to that effect? Where you had to prove it to yourself, somehow, some way, somewhere that you could make the future really *happen* for yourself?

That's what LMD meant to our own sweet Boys. It may not have been the best song they ever wrote, but it was the Prime Step for them; it was their first shot at immortality. And such a humble offering...but what a seed of passion contained therein, don't you think ?

Regards,
Alan (awp@bitstream.com *OR* uunet!huxley!awp)

---
"They tried to fob you off on this musical charlatan, but *I* gave him the test." **100590#21
--- ** posted two days early since ** I'll be briefly away from ** the net on 10/5.

Copyright (c) 1990 by Alan W. Pollack All Rights Reserved This article may be reproduced, retransmitted, redistributed and otherwise propagated at will, provided that this notice remains intact and in place.

P.S. I Love You

0
Your rating: None

Cover versions and notes on The Beatles' song "P.S. I Love You".

Provenance
Written By: 
Lennon/McCartney
Year: 
1962
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
Paul McCartney
Cover Versions
Alan W. Pollack's "Notes On"

Notes on "P.S. I Love You" (PSILY.1)

KEY     D Major (with Aeolian inflections)

METER   4/4

FORM    Intro -> Verse -> Verse -> Bridge ->
                Verse -> Bridge -> Verse -> Outro (complete ending)

GENERAL POINTS OF INTEREST


Style and Form

- The form is virtually identical to that of "Misery", with two bridges separated by only one verse. Even though PSILY uses a much richer set of chords than "Misery", its verse section is still quite bound to the home key, and for that matter, so is its bridge. Therefore, the same avoidance of harmonic claustrophobia would seem equally applicable to both songs, in terms of dispensing with an extra verse section before the second bridge.

- An unusual and creative formal touch here is the way that the intro turns out to be a subtle variation of the bridge.

- The lyrics of the four verses create a relatively clunky pattern of ABAB; compare with "In Spite of All the Danger", of all things.

- Rhythmic attack is virtually always right on the downbeat in this song. The little grace note ahead of the bar in the first syllable of the word "remember" stands out in contrast.


Melody and Harmony

- The intro tune here has a melodic kink around the 7th degree of the scale (C#) similar to what we saw in the verse of "She Loves You". The beginning of the verse traverses an entire octave, scale-wise and with a couple of juicy appoggiaturas, only to balance it out at the end with an upward leap of the same octave.

- The group of chords used in this song is much more exotic than what we've seen in the other very early period songs we've looked at. In addition to the standard fare of what is diatonically available within the home key, we have the chords of the flat-VI (B flat) and flat-VII (C Major), both of which may be said, in theoretical terms, to be borrowed from the parallel minor key of 'd'. The very use of these chords lends an exotic mixed-mode feeling to the song.

- The strangest chord of all in the song is the dominant 7th chord on C#, employed in the intro as a surrogate 'V'. The naturally occurring chord on C# in the key of D is a *diminished* seventh chord and *that* VII chord works nicely as a substitute V because it is the sonic equivalent of the V7 chord with the root note missing. In modifying the C# diminished chord into a dominant 7th, the Boys throw us a curve ball in that you'd sooner expect the latter chord to resolve to the key of F#. Against all textbook rules and logic, they rely on the stepwise movement of all voices (C# -> D, E# -> F#, G# ->A, and B -> A) to make it "work". Still, coming right at the beginning as it does, it's an attention grabber.

- In addition to the chord choices, we find that several of the chord *progressions* in this song are unusual. We're used to finding in the typical early Beatles song such as ISHST, the pervasive influence of I-VI-V sorts of chord progressions which convey a strong sense of directed kinetic motion that is the musical equivalent of Hemingway's much celebrated use of transitive verbs. Here, in PSILY, we find two different types of unusual chord progressions.

- The first unusual type of progression is called a "chord stream", characterized by sliding, stepwise root movement from chord to chord. In the verse section, we find I->ii->I, and flat-VI->flat-VII->I as examples. This is a technique is most closely associated with either early 20th century Impressionism or Jazz and it happens to break one of the standard old-fashioned rules against using parallel octaves and fifths between chords. Aesthetically, it suggests a languid sensuality.

- The second unusual type of progression is called a "deceptive cadence", characterized by the V (dominant) being followed by something other than the I chord. In the verse section, yet again, we find examples of the V being resolved in one case to the plain vi chord, and later on to the flat-VI. Aesthetically, it suggests a last minute retreat from coming to closure; a musical approach/avoidance.


Arrangement

- The look and feel here is decidedly *not* that of rock-n-roll. It's rather more like lounge-pop or Latin dance music, in large part due to the tempo, beat, and choice of percussion instrumentation.

- The vocal arrangement presents Paul in the solo spotlight with a particular style of backing vocal from John and George. Though the backing part persists virtually all the way through, there is more interesting detail to it than initially meets the eye.

- Note, for example, how in all verses except the last one, the backers sing behind isolated words only, making for a musically italic/bold effect. In the last verse, yet again to avoid foolish consistency, this effect is dropped in favor of them singing all the way through with Paul.

- Similarly in the second bridge, we have the successive interjections by solo voices in between the phrases for the sake of some colorful variety.

- The following piece of trivia is usually eclipsed by the "Love Me Do" story, but it should be noted that it is Andy White (again) on the drums in this song; poor Ringo plays only the maracas.

SECTION-BY-SECTION WALKTHROUGH


Intro

- Even though the words of the bridge are repeated in this intro, the resemblance between the intro and the bridge is cleverly disguised by the addition here of the C#7 chord, and the fact that in the bridge, we're used to hearing an additional vocal part that harmonizes a third above the melody:

        -------------- 3X --------------
        |G      C#      |D              |D      A       |D              |
     D:  IV    VII 7     I                      V        I
                  #5
                  #3

- By the way, this is yet another convergent start away from the home key. The singers come right in on the first beat, without a cue.


Verse

- The verse is not only an unusual ten measures long, but is made up of four phrases of several different lengths:

         "Treasure these few words ...."        "Keep all my love ..."
        <------ phrase #1, 3 measures --------><- phrase #2, 2 measures ->

        |D           |e           |D           |A           |b           |
         I            ii           I            V            vi


         "P.S I love you ...."            "You, you, you ...."
        <--- phrase #3, 2.5 measures ---><--- phrase #4, 2.5 measures --->

        |A           |B-flat      |-  -  -  C   |D           |-          |
         V            flat VI            flat VII  I

- Articulation of the phrasing is nicely aided by the harmony with its multiple deceptive resolutions of V, first to vi, then to flat vi, then *finally* to I, but even then, only via the flat VII!

- The melodic arch of the first three phrases has a bottom-heavy asymmetry that is balanced out by the dramatic swing upward of an octave in the final phrase. Note the repeatedly expressive use of appoggiaturas; i.e., on the words "together", "forever", "P.S", and the middle "you" of the final phrase.


Bridge

- The contrast of this bridge to its surrounding verses is manifest in its simple chord choices and regularized shape. We're on a strict harmonic diet here of I-IV-V, and the eight measure section is articulated into two phrases of four measures each:

        -------------- 3X --------------
        |G              |D              |D      A       |D              |
         IV              I                      V        I

Outro

- In typical fashion, this outro grows out of the final measures of the final verse and presents the formulaic triple-repeat of the little hook phrase in a relatively straightforward manner.

SOME FINAL THOUGHTS

- PSILY is ultimately an ironic blend of both backward and forward looking influences. On the one hand, the relatively soppy lyrics and the pop arrangement are reminiscent of their cover repertoire from the Decca audition period. By the same token, there's a technical sophistication here, especially in the harmony and uneven phrasing, which looks well beyond many of the other apparently more original songs from the early EMI days.

- Aside from the sophistication of any specific technical device used here per se, the most creative touch of all (IMHO) is in the way that the the successive deceptive cadences in the verse provide an exquisitely realistic shyness and emotional "playing footsie" that otherwise belies the readymade paper-cut valentine of the words.

Regards,

Alan (awp@world.std.com)

---

"Quite right, invites to gambling dens full of easy money and fast women,
 chicken sandwiches, and cornets of caviar, disgusting!"      031101#30.1

---

Revision History
080591 30.0 Original release 032001 30.1 Add pass-two observations and copy edit Copyright (c) 1991,2001 by Alan W. Pollack All Rights Reserved

This article may be reproduced, retransmitted, redistributed and otherwise propagated at will, provided that this notice remains intact and in place.

Baby It's You

3
Your rating: None Average: 3 (1 vote)

Cover versions of the song "Baby It's You", which also was covered by The Beatles.

Provenance
Year: 
1961
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
John Lennon
Cover Versions

Do You Want to Know a Secret

3
Your rating: None Average: 3 (1 vote)

Cover versions and notes on The Beatles' song "Do You Want to Know a Secret"

Provenance
Written By: 
Lennon/McCartney
Year: 
1963
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
George Harrison
Cover Versions
Alan W. Pollack's "Notes On"

Notes on "Do You Want To Know A Secret" (DYWTKAS.1)

KEY	E Major

METER	4/4

FORM	Intro -> Verse -> Verse -> Bridge -> Verse -> Outro (fadeout)

GENERAL POINTS OF INTEREST


Style and Form

- The intro is slow, the verse long, and the bridge short. The form is compact, the less popular single bridge model, and the overall duration of the song brief, as well; a likely consequence of the large amount of repetitious rhetoric built into the verse section.

- No exaggeration, the lyrics here, which are identical through all three verses, may nose out even "Love Me Do" for skimpiness, though the use of different material in both the intro and the bridge makes up some of the deficit.

- The song fairly overflows with a number of leitmotifs all built out of chromatic scale fragments of 3 or 4 notes; the rising lead guitar riff at the end of the intro, a descending portion of the verse melody (on the "woah" that precedes the word "closer"), and in the recurrent little descending chord stream that appears in the second half of almost all the odd-numbered measures of the verse.

- Singing in the intro begins after the downbeat. In the verses, it is introduced with a long guitar pickup before the beat, an effect that is carried through the rest of the verse melody. For contrast, the bridge attacks the sung material right ON the beat.


Melody and Harmony

- The tune contains mostly scale-wise movement punctuated by a dramatic falsetto leap upward near the end of the verse before ending it off with a descending chromatic scale fragment

- The song is quite securely in E Major in spite of a firm modulation to the axis of A Major/f# minor during the bridge. Allusions to the parallel minor key of e in both intro and verse provide a touch of pathos as well as harmonic variety.

- The single most unusual chord in the song is the "flat II", found here in both the intro and the verse; we've seen this one before in "Things We Said Today" and "You're Going To Lose That Girl".


Arrangement

- The song leaves a lasting impression of having been enwrapped in a haze of gentle reverberation even though it was not literally nor entirely recorded that way.

- George gets the first of his few chances to take the lead vocal in a LennonMcCartney tune. The composers themselves show up vocally in the form of an old-fashioned "doo-wop"-like backing starting in the second verse. One rare outtake has them singing the backing vocal even in the first verse, the latter being a clear violation of what would emerge as a Beatles layering trademark; which is why they probably dropped that for the official recording.

- Like the piano in-lays of "Misery", the overdubbed tapping of drum sticks in the bridge is a musically small touch that is historically notable because of the trend in recording/arranging practice it signals.

SECTION-BY-SECTION WALKTHROUGH


Intro

- The intro is not merely "adagio", but entirely "ad libitum"; my delineation below of where the 4/4 measure boundaries are is purely a guess:

        |e		|a	e	|G		|F	B	|

      e: i		 iv	i	 III		flat II V

- The shift from e minor to E Major which occurs between intro and first verse is exceedingly smooth because of the "parallel" relationship between the two keys, but if you recall the first time you ever heard this song, it still has the power to surprise.

- Though emotionally and compositionally simplistic on one level, that minorto -Major transition still effectively conveys the angst-cum-epiphanisticjoy "we" all go through in the unique moment of timidly expressing a burgeoning fondness.


Verse

- This verse has an unusual length of 14 measures and is designed as a couplet of two uneven phrases that share a common beginning:

        "Listen ..."
         ------------- 2 x -------------
      m.1
        |E	 g#  g  |f#	B7	|E	 g#  g  |f#	F	|
      E: I	         ii	V	 I		 ii     flat II

        "Closer ..."
         ----------------- 2 x -----------------
       m.7
        |E	g#   g      |f#		B7	|A		|B	   |
         I		     ii		V	 IV		 V

       m.13
        |c#		|f#	B	|
         vi		 ii	V

- The first phrase is six measures and would seem to run harmonically in circles if it were not for its surprise ending in which we find yet another application of the chromatic chord stream cliche. Note how the F chord is unusually placed on top of the note C in the bass; as though Paul were uncomfortable with a certain awkwardness about the chord progression and trying to paper it over a bit.

- The second phrase is eight measures and though it too starts off running in the same tight circle, its harmonic rhythm broadens out into a deceptive cadence on vi before cycling back again to V.

- The melody of this verse is just as repetitious as the chord changes, and the falsetto flip in the last measure finally and satisfyingly opens up the previously constricted pitch range.

- The chord stream of g# minor -> g minor -> f# is more coloristic than "functional"; the ear comprehends the structural harmonic progression as though from E in the first measure to f# in the second. The *other* chord stream in measure 6 - 7 is actually more structurally significant than the previous one in that one hears the F Major chord as a surrogate Dominant with respect to the E (I) chord which opens the second phrase. Note how the melodic use of C natural at this juncture creates an allusion to the minor mode of e.

- The rhythm is in a shuffling beat throughout until the final four measures where it's suddenly interrupted by syncopation (m. 11 - 12), which then moderates to a pulsating bass drum beat before settling back to the shuffle.

- George's pronunciation of the word "ear" (especially in the first and third verses) offers us what 'Simon Marshal' would someday describe as "the old adenoidal glottal stop for our benefit".


Bridge

- This is one of the shortest bridges we've ever seen; only six measures long, and built, just like the verse, out of two phrases unequal in length yet sharing the same opening content:

         ------------- 2 x -------------
        |A	f#	|c#	b	|f#		|B		|
     f#: III	i	 v	iv	 i
     E : IV       		       E:ii		 V

- The harmonic transition into this section from the V chord on B, which ends the previous verse, is somewhat abrupt though by no means rude; the pivot for the modulation is not obvious to the ear, but at least it *is* a common chord to both keys involved.

- The pivot back to the home key is much smoother. It's a rather superb example of just how so-called pivot modulations work for those who have trouble grasping the concept: note how when the f# chord is followed by the B Major one, the ear retroactively reinterprets it as the ii chord of the original home key of E.

- In the arrangement, the do-dahs are given a break in deference to George's solo vocal. And Paul, having played up to this point a nicely elaborate bass line, gets a little carried away in this section and winds up making a mistake on the first c# chord, by playing a B natural which clashes with the chord above it.


Outro

- The deceptive cadence near the end of the verse is leveraged and recycled for the inevitable three-repeat coda.

- The song fades very rapidly and the outtake with the doo-dahs in the first verse reveals that at least one studio performance of the song, if not the official version, actually ended, barely a few seconds after our fade, with a complete ending on an added-sixth chord.

- That added sixth so nicely summarizes the song that it's especially unfortunate they chose to mask it out. Looking back over the full length of the piece, one notes how much the sonority of the added-sixth resonates within it; e.g., the repeated appoggiatura of C#->B on the words "listen" and "secret" in the verse, and the large number of deceptive cadences in which you so strongly anticipate the next chord to be E, yet it turns out to be (surprise!) c# instead. To the extent that this added-sixth has the incidental sound of the I (E) and vi (c#) superimposed upon each other, it makes for an effective harmonic double-entendre.

- BTW, Paul makes yet another mistake in the bass line of this section, analogous to the one in the bridge.

SOME FINAL THOUGHTS

- The aesthetic of sentimental shy puppy love and gauzy soft focus is not one to which the Boys were often drawn over the long run; Sweet and Cuddly Moptops notwithstanding, it didn't suit them as a group. Even here, they manage to rescue this one from drowning in its own cliches only by means of an abundance of interesting details and a modicum of sincerity.

- Ironically, it's the more subtle aesthetic of repetition here, which you would be tempted to denigrate offhand as a matter of lazy craft, which provides one of the major sources of emotional realism and "sincerity" to the song. I'd bet, for example, that anyone out there who relates to the pre-confessional anxiety of the intro will also vouch for the corresponding post-declaration euphoria in which all they wanted, even needed, to do was repeat the same words of love like a mantra, endlessly without stopping.

Regards,
Alan (awp@world.std.com)


---
"I don't really know, but it sounded distinguished like,
 didn't it ?"                                                 032101#32.1

---


Revision History
081991  32.0    Original release
032101  32.1    Add pass-two observations and copy edit




                Copyright (c) 1991, 2001 by Alan W. Pollack
                          All Rights Reserved
This article may be reproduced, retransmitted, redistributed and otherwise propagated at will, provided that this notice remains intact and in place.

There's a Place

2
Your rating: None Average: 2 (1 vote)
Provenance
Written By: 
Lennon/McCartney
Year: 
1963
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
John Lennon
Cover Versions